← Everyone who has spoken in the chamber
Carina Ståhl Herrstedt (SD)
What Carina Ståhl Herrstedt has said in the chamber of the Swedish Riksdag, debate by debate. The lines under each debate sum up a speech; they are written and translated by AI in advance and may contain errors, so check against the speech.
Kammarkoll has the Riksdag's speeches from 26 September 2022 onwards; older debates are not included.
HVB homes criminal networks, aid budget and security debate
- Asks when the government will issue a statement on what they intend to do regarding accompaniment. Criticizes that the matter has been prepared in the Government Offices for almost 500 days despite a previous announcement. Read the speech
- Criticizes that the work with guidance is proceeding too slowly and that things are constantly being prepared. Asks if a decision can be expected soon or if an additional 500 days are required. Read the speech
Support for persons with disabilities: assistance and management
- Argues that the right to accompaniment has been eroded through changed legal interpretation and wants the government to investigate fee-free accompaniment as well as a specific law. Criticizes the lack of transparency in determining assistance compensation and wants to investigate a long-term, index-regulated financing model. Also wants to expand the regulatory framework for car support. Read the speech
- Agrees that it is good to reach an agreement on proposals for announcements. Explains that he/she cannot support proposals that involve costs due to the budget cooperation with the government. Read the speech
- Agree that the questions are important and that the work has proceeded too slowly. Hope that the government can be prioritized to deal with the proposal that is on the table so that people can enter the workforce. Read the speech
Government policy, EU cooperation, crime and social issues
- Criticizes that companies that have had their permits revoked can continue to operate through loopholes in the law. Argues that the exception for persons who arrange their own assistance facilitates criminal actors. Read the speech
Gender Recognition Act: self-identification and medical care
- Criticizes that decisions are made without taking into account new scientific evidence. Argues that the opportunity to send the matter out for a new referral round has been denied despite changed advice from Socialstyrelsen. Read the speech
- Argues that lowered age limits for legal gender reassignment lead to more hormone treatments. Criticizes that the proposal has not gone out for a new referral process despite new evidence and argues that the delay does not constitute a significant disadvantage. Read the speech
Standardized parental deduction interpretation and regulation
- Notes that children with extensive functional impairments have fallen below the 20-hour limit due to double deductions. Argues that an analysis group must ensure that the correct measures are taken and moves for approval of the proposal in the report. Read the speech
- Argues that it is a natural order to investigate whether the ordinance is being applied incorrectly before proposals are drafted. Claims that the government has taken the initiative to analyze whether changes should be made in the ordinance or the legislation. Read the speech
- Argues that it is an established problem to analyze how it is best rectified. Emphasizes that one does not want to return to the old parental responsibility and that the analysis shall ensure that the correct measures are taken. Read the speech
- Argues that it is unclear how a decision to zero out the parental deduction would affect the municipalities. Explains that the party does not support the reservation because it requires prompt decisions before an analysis has been conducted. Read the speech
- Argues that there are too many questions regarding how the deduction should be reduced or zeroed out for one to be able to act hastily. Assures that the government basis agrees that the problem must be addressed through an analysis of how it is best done. Read the speech
Parental deduction for children with functional variations
- Argues that the government has already taken initiative by appointing an analysis group. Asks how money has been saved and when an announcement would have been in place. Read the speech
- Means that one stands up for one's politics and that the government is now acting. Suggests that the government takes the initiative for measures through an analysis to ensure that changes are made in a good way. Read the speech
Healthcare crisis, tax cuts and 16-year-old gender reassignment
- Criticizes that the government is pushing through a changed gender legislation that facilitates legal gender reassignment without investigation or diagnosis. Argues that the proposal risks promoting welfare fraud and being used by organized crime to evade controls. Read the speech
Transfer guide dog operations from Synskadades Riksförbund
- Proposes approval of the committee's proposal to transfer the guide dog operations to the Agency for Participation. Underlines the importance of preserving Synskadades Riksförbunds expertise and ensuring resources to maintain quality during the transition. Read the speech
- Argues that the party has fundamentally been against the change because the operation has functioned well. However, wants to support the proposal in order to be able to participate in the process and influence the decision in the right direction. Read the speech
- Argues that the focus should be on ensuring that visually impaired people receive guide dogs regardless of where the activity is located. Wants the activity to be followed up and points out that the party has chosen to influence the proposal in the committee. Read the speech
Support for people with disabilities: LSS, personal assistance
- Criticizes Försäkringskassan's harsh assessments of basic needs and considers the Social Democrats responsible for previous regressions. Argues that all basic needs should be considered basis for assistance, wants to see a national LSS boost and that the debate returns to being about rights instead of costs. Read the speech
- Argues that a previous announcement regarding basic needs should be met as soon as possible. Explains that the party therefore does not support the reservation and will continue to pursue the issue. Read the speech
- Argues that the proposed announcement was actually about a supplementary directive to the Main Responsibility Investigation to include basic needs. Wants the government to address the fundamental issue but is prepared to help push them forward. Read the speech
Accessibility Directive: S wants media law changes, V criticizes
- Welcomes the proposal as it promotes equality and reduces digital exclusion for the elderly and persons with disabilities. Argues that a follow-up should be conducted to ensure that cost increases for users do not counteract the directive's purpose. Read the speech
Energy policy, citizenship, healthcare and working environment
- Questions whether the Minister has looked into the issue of Försäkringskassan's retroactive clawbacks of assistance compensation. Further questions whether there are thoughts on guidelines to prevent compensation from being clawed back from persons who have followed the authority's decisions. Read the speech
Welfare, immigration and economy: S, KD and M debate measures
- Asks if the minister plans to introduce a prescription period for retroactive claims and how she intends to ensure that the law is followed, as Försäkringskassan in practice makes retroactive claims even though organizers have done nothing wrong. Read the speech
Source: The Swedish Parliament. Kammarkoll is an independent service.