Kammarkoll

Search everything said in the debates of the Swedish Riksdag

← Everyone who has spoken in the chamber

Isabell Mixter (V)

Former member of the Riksdag · 186 speeches in 64 debates since 19 October 2022

What Isabell Mixter has said in the chamber of the Swedish Riksdag, debate by debate. The lines under each debate sum up a speech; they are written and translated by AI in advance and may contain errors, so check against the speech.

Kammarkoll has the Riksdag's speeches from 26 September 2022 onwards; older debates are not included.

  1. Stricter conditions for independent schools and profit bans

    Skärpta villkor för friskolesektorn · 13 August 2026

    • Criticizes that the government has not carried out a complete renovation of the friskola system as profit extraction and fee systems remain unchanged. Argues that the large corporations can continue to reap profits from the students' education. Asks why the Liberals do not join the proposal for a general profit ban. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government has failed to change the voucher system and the school fee so as not to offend the Moderaterna and the Sverigedemokraterna. Argues that school fees end up with shareholders instead of in the school and asks why the Liberalerna do not vote to stop the profit-seeking. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the current system gives corporations the freedom to establish themselves and take out profits at the expense of tax money. Argues that the Sweden Democrats defend a system where money goes to shareholders instead of to the students. Read the speech
    • Argues that tax money should go to students and teachers instead of profit. Criticizes that the bill does not guarantee quality and points out that the government has failed to require Swedish teacher certification. Asks why the profits should be defended. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's proposal as insufficient as it does not stop profit extraction from established corporations or solve inequality. Wants to introduce a total profit ban, scrap the voucher system and ban the limited company form to ensure that school fees go to the students. Read the speech
    • Argues that Swedish schools have deteriorated and that more students are being left behind. Criticizes that today's school system creates inequality and argues that the government does not provide sufficient resources to compensate for this. Read the speech
    • Argues that the goal must be that all students succeed in school. Criticizes that independent schools can take out billion-kronor profits while the municipal school is being depleted. Criticizes that the government is doing nothing about the queue system within independent schools. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that Sweden is the only country that allows unlimited profit extraction from school funds. Argues that it is shareholders, not immigrants, who steal tax money and harm the school. Read the speech
    • Wants to remove exemptions from requirements for teacher qualifications. Means that the money for the school must be increased for smaller classes and more special educators. Wants to abolish the limited company form to stop the pursuit of profit and let the money stay with the students and teachers. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that freedom of choice in practice is limited to those who can get in line first. Argues that all children have a right to a good school and that tax money must not go towards profits for shareholders. Asks who freedom of choice is actually for. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the right of free establishment can harm the quality of municipal schools. Argues that student fees should go to students and teachers instead of to profits or schools abroad. Read the speech
  2. Ten-grade system and national final exams to counter inflation

    Ett likvärdigt betygssystem · 8 June 2026

    • Argues that the current grading system has led to many students being left without eligibility for upper secondary school and wants to scrap the market school to ensure that everyone receives the right support. Criticizes the government's handling of digital national tests and demands an investigation into how the new system should be implemented in komvux. Read the speech
    • Argues that it will not get better by replacing one agency with another. Criticizes the government for having failed in the dialogue with Skolverket. Points out that the government cannot guarantee the feasibility of the proposed digital final exams. Read the speech
    • Expresses concern that the government cannot guarantee digital national final exams. Argues that it would mean an impossible administrative burden for the schools and criticizes the government's weakness in taking responsibility for the project. Read the speech
  3. Wind power in municipalities: compensation and local impact

    Vindkraft i kommuner · 4 June 2026

    • Argues that the government should clarify the compensation to residents in multi-family housing by taking into account the number of apartments. Advocates that the property tax is returned directly to the municipalities and wants to introduce a production-based compensation to local communities. Read the speech
  4. Teacher teaching and planning time regulation and admin burden

    Tid för undervisningsuppdraget · 4 June 2026

    • Argues that legislation on regulated teaching and planning time is necessary to improve teachers' working environment. Wants the state to provide sufficient resources for the reform and motions that it be properly funded. Read the speech
  5. School support: L wants nationalization, S more equity funds

    Förbättrat stöd i skolan · 3 June 2026

    • Argues that 100,000 students today do not receive the support they are entitled to. Emphasizes that the right resources, such as more teachers and special educators, are more important than system changes and asks if the government will prioritize the school over tax cuts. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that previous school reforms have been ideologically driven rather than knowledge-based. Argues that the government has not acted on proposals for smaller class sizes despite being in power. Rejects the rhetoric about municipal surpluses as these are due to cuts and layoffs. Read the speech
    • Argues that many students lack eligibility due to lack of support and resources. Criticizes that the government shifts the responsibility onto the municipalities and advocates for smaller class sizes, more staff as well as that school funding goes to students instead of profit. Read the speech
  6. New curricula: subject knowledge, student influence and sex education

    Nya läroplaner - för en stark kunskapsskola · 3 June 2026

    • Criticizes that the government and the Liberals are not taking responsibility for the failures of the previous curricula. Argues that the proposal significantly weakens sex education by removing important topics from the initial parts. Asks why the government wants to back away from a responsibility that recently yielded good results. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government wants to dismantle improved sex education and remove work against honor violence and discrimination from the curricula. Argues that this weakens the students' sense of security and makes it harder for authorities to monitor the school. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government has refrained from investing in the school and criticizes that other values besides knowledge and democracy are being erased in the curriculum. Asks if the government and the Sverigedemokraterna intend to remove all other values. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government and the Sverigedemokraterna blame immigration instead of taking responsibility for falling school results and budget cuts. Argues that equality and non-discrimination must be the entire school's responsibility and that the relocation of sex education weakens this. Read the speech
    • Argues that it is positive to increase the knowledge focus for younger ages, but criticizes that the government weakens sex education, student influence, and protection against offensive treatment by removing important parts from the initial parts of the curriculum. Argues that the school's failure is due to systemic errors and budget cuts rather than student influence and warns that politicians should not decide on pedagogical methods. Read the speech
    • Argues that entrepreneurship has a short history and that the school has many other important priorities. Criticizes that the government wants to downplay the school's responsibility for sex education, against discrimination, and for a non-confessional school. Read the speech
    • Argues that entrepreneurship is not as important as democratic values. Criticizes that the government wants to remove student influence, equality, and weaken sex education in the proposal. Read the speech
  7. School safety and study environment: resources, order, mobile-free

    (forts. från § 12) Bättre förutsättningar för trygghet och studiero i skolan (forts. UbU22) · 27 May 2026

    • Criticizes the government's cheap rhetoric about order as a way to hide failures and significant cuts in the school. Asks how the significant cuts affect safety and studies in the school. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's rhetoric on discipline and argues that the actual cuts lead to more students per class and fewer teachers. Argues that the government prioritizes tax cuts for the richest over school resources. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government misses that increased resources, more teachers and smaller classes are the most important measures for safety and study. Criticizes the proposal to remove documentation requirements upon deportation and argues that students must be included in the development of school rules. Read the speech
    • Asks why the documentation requirement for removals from the classroom should be abolished. Argues that students who disturb may have underlying causes such as violence at home or ADHD and deserve respect. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government's cuts lead to fewer teachers and larger groups. Argues that the tax break for the richest means that the students pay the price and asks if all students are equally worthy. Read the speech
  8. Vocational education: L, S, and M debate labor market links

    Bättre förutsättningar för yrkesutbildning · 27 May 2026

    • Argues that attractive work environments and good salaries are required to get young people to choose vocational training. Expresses concern that increased subcontracting can lead to varying quality and requires clear frameworks as well as control of the educational providers. Read the speech
  9. Public access for school providers and simplified rules

    Offentlighetsprincipen med lättnadsregler för enskilda mindre huvudmän i skolväsendet · 21 May 2026

    • Criticizes the government's measures as superficial and argues that they protect the shareholders' profits. Points out that the Liberals previously voted against the principle of public access and asks why smaller principals need separate legislation. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government for protecting the profits of large school companies. Argues that smaller independent schools should not be granted exemptions from the principle of public access since even small municipalities meet the requirements. Asks how the speaker views the fact that many documents can still be regarded as business secrets. Read the speech
    • Asks why the Sweden Democrats are against a differentiated school funding to compensate municipal schools for their higher costs. Read the speech
    • Asks why it is not reasonable that the municipalities receive a larger compensation for their assignment compared to independent schools, since the municipalities have higher costs for administrative overhead. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's proposal for containing too many exceptions and risks that trade secrets are prioritized over transparency. Argues that the principle of public access is a democratic prerequisite for scrutinizing the activities of friskolor and the use of tax money. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government takes credit for the principle of public access when the Tidö parties previously voted no. Asks why exceptions for smaller entities are needed when current legislation already requires prompt disclosure. Expresses concern that resource schools will not be able to be scrutinized. Read the speech
    • Asks why less independent principals should not be able to manage the same tasks as municipal principals. Criticizes that the government protects shareholders and corporations and argues that the principle of public access does not provide sufficient insight into the profits of independent school companies. Read the speech
  10. Housing construction, healthcare queues and gang sentences

    Frågestund · 7 May 2026

    • Criticizes profit-driven online doctor companies for offering uncertain and insecure care. Asks the minister what will be done to clean up the unprofessional online doctor industry. Read the speech
  11. Energy, school, justice, migration and environment policy

    Frågestund · 23 April 2026

    • Criticizes that profit-driven actors open schools abroad and that Swedish tax money is used for school activities in other countries. Argues that the government does not propose measures despite a large majority wanting to ban profit in schools. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government will not fulfill its promises because investigations into school fees and profit in schools are sitting in the drawer or are delayed. Asks if the government considers it reasonable to use Swedish tax money abroad. Read the speech
  12. Teacher certification and Kunskapsskolan resources report

    Lärare och elever och Riksrevisionens rapport om systemet för lärarlegitimation · 12 March 2026

    • Argues that it is the Liberals' ideological foundations that govern the school and that they have failed with their reforms. Criticizes that the abolition of student influence lacks research support and asks why the Liberals have previously failed with their reforms. Read the speech
    • Argues that there is a lack of research support for removing student influence. Wants to remove exceptions in the teacher license as they are systematically exploited and asks if the government will act on the opposition's proposal. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the free school reform and that tax money goes to shareholders' profits instead of to teachers and students. Asks if the Sweden Democrats want to remove the exemptions from the requirement for a teacher's license. Read the speech
    • Rejects the claim that the party wants to close schools and clarifies that the goal is to ban profit in schools by stopping school activities in the form of limited companies. Argues that the current system is unique to Sweden and demands that the opposition stop blocking the proposals. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the low level of the debate regarding school meals and argues that teachers should be given more influence and resources. Wants to remove exceptions in the teacher qualification, tighten the regulations for reporting unsuitable teachers and increase the proportion of qualified teachers. Proposes smaller classes, reinforced student health services and more resources to support all students. Read the speech
  13. Preschool quality: smaller groups, staffing and language rules

    Förskolan · 11 March 2026

    • Criticizes that the children's groups have become larger during the government's mandate period due to a lack of economic resources for the municipalities. Argues that the government must act now to stop the closures of preschools and staff. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government is responsible for staff becoming exhausted and being signed off on sick leave due to lack of resources. Wants legislation on smaller child groups and argues that the state must cover the cost development in the municipalities. Read the speech
    • Wants to legislate for smaller child groups and increased staffing density in preschool. Proposes a childcare lift, a protected professional title for childcare workers as well as a ban on profit-making limited companies. Criticizes the government for not increasing state grants in line with the cost increases. Read the speech
  14. School quality, teacher shortage and independent schools

    (forts. från § 11) Övergripande skolfrågor och Grundläggande om utbildning (forts. UbU7 och UbU8) · 4 March 2026

    • Argues that teaching should be completely free from religious elements. Criticizes that tax money is used for overseas expansion and profit extraction in other countries and asks why the Sverigedemokraterna do not stop this. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the current independent school system where unlimited profits from Swedish tax money are used for overseas expansion. Argues that the government's proposal does not limit these profits or the use of funds in other countries. Read the speech
    • Argues that the school has become unequal due to the independent school system and the per-pupil funding. Wants to nationalize the school, reduce class sizes and introduce a cap for the size of children's groups in after-school centers. Read the speech
    • Argues that today's student fee system is unsuitable because it can lead to an inflation of independent schools seeking profits. Criticizes that the system turns students into "a bag of money" and allows compensation for activities that are not performed. Read the speech
    • Argues that structural grants for students with lower educational backgrounds or foreign-born students are equal for all schools. Wants the government to rectify the system error where school funds go to profits for shareholders in order to be able to give more money to schools with more difficult student populations. Read the speech
  15. School reforms: national class sizes, profit limits, knowledge

    Övergripande skolfrågor och Grundläggande om utbildning · 4 March 2026

    • Asks the government about deficiencies in the independent school system, students' grades in core subjects, and the employment of teachers. Criticizes the Liberals' previous voting against the principle of public access and the ban on limited companies in schools. Argues that school results have deteriorated under the Liberals' leadership. Criticizes that the party focuses on banning "ugly" schools instead of solving problems with large classes or teacher shortages. Read the speech
    • Argues that profit in children's education is ugly. Asks if the Liberals instead want to ban the deportation of teenagers rather than focusing on beautiful schools. Read the speech
    • Confirms that school today is segregated and that students with well-educated parents have better opportunities. Asks how the Moderaterna will achieve a compensatory school with their policy. Read the speech
    • Hopes that the Moderaterna actually implement the proposal on differentiated school funding. Criticizes the market school for enabling unlimited profit on Swedish tax money. Argues that good order requires equal conditions and considers that teachers' handling of expulsions should be addressed in the Education Committee. Read the speech
  16. Economy, school, and labor market policy debate in Riksdag

    Frågestund · 26 February 2026

    • Criticizes that the government voted no to the principle of public access for independent schools. Asks why it takes until 2027 before the police can alert independent schools in cases of suspected child pornography crimes. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government has turned a blind eye to problems with independent schools for a long time. Asks why the government defends the market school when it prioritizes profit over the students' safety. Read the speech
  17. Social issues: profit in schools, veils and healthcare queues

    Frågestund · 29 January 2026

    • Criticizes that municipalities are forced to pay for empty school places due to the right of free establishment. Asks why the government does not propose a veto to prevent taxpayers' money from being wasted on profits for shareholders. Read the speech
    • Asks why the government defends a system where schools can establish themselves freely despite negative consequences for municipalities and taxpayers. Criticizes that quality deficiencies are not sufficiently deterrent to stop profit-taking. Read the speech
  18. Preschool safety and group sizes: V demands legislated limits

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:231 om en trygg miljö i förskolan · 29 January 2026

    • Argues that the children's groups are too large, which leads to stress among the staff and affects the children's environment. Criticizes the government's state subsidies for not being sufficient to reduce the group sizes and demands a legislated maximum. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's initiatives as the worst cuts in 30 years and argues that the friskola reform only consists of small changes that do not stop large profits. Wants to put children's well-being at the center instead of shareholders' profits. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's school budget as a numerical trick and argues that the investigation into the size of children's groups will not lead to any actual changes. Argues that the government's policy does not stop large profits in the independent school system. Read the speech
  19. Education and research: school hours, phone ban and funding

    Utbildning och universitetsforskning · 15 December 2025

    • Asks how the government parties intend to carry out a complete renovation of the friskola system and whether they will proceed with the Skolpengsutredningen. Read the speech
    • Argues that the independent schools are owned by a few corporations that take out large amounts of tax money. Criticizes that the opposition parties voted no to proposals to limit profit extraction and looks forward to a government bill on increased compensation to the municipalities. Read the speech
    • Asks how Patrick Reslow views the irregularities and lack of supervision at a preschool owned by Tellusgruppen. Argues that the group prioritizes profits over the children's safety and needs. Read the speech
    • Asks about the government's plans to regulate and shut down unserious actors. Criticizes that profit funds are used for expansion abroad and highlights deficiencies in specific independent school groups. Wants to know which concrete measures are planned. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's cuts and the market school system which creates inequality and resource shortages. Wants to increase funding, legislate a maximum cap for children's groups in preschool, increase staffing levels, and strengthen school health services. Read the speech
  20. Government policies: care deduction, deportation, privatization

    Frågestund · 6 November 2025

    • Argues that the government has prioritized tax cuts over the preschool's safety and resources. Asks if the government intends to provide funds to the municipalities to reduce the size of children's groups and increase safety. Read the speech
  21. Nya Ostkustbanan management and infrastructure expansion debate

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:8 om hanteringen av Nya Ostkustbanan · 26 September 2025

    • Argues that the New East Coast Line is crucial for industry and travel due to current bottlenecks. Criticizes the station location in Hudiksvall and asks how the government will ensure that the project is completed by 2035. Read the speech
    • Asks whether the government considers it appropriate to place stations outside of cities. Argues that poor accessibility harms work commuting and sparsely populated areas, and emphasizes the need for double-track expansion due to vulnerable infrastructure. Read the speech
  22. Crime policy, social reforms and economy: prison rental

    Frågestund · 25 September 2025

    • Asks whether the government intends to take measures to ensure that the requirement for a teacher's license applies to all teachers. Argues that independent schools with English-language instruction have deficiencies in teaching and lower teacher salaries in order to increase profits. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government only talks about regulating the friskolor without taking concrete actions. Asks when the government will begin to act to introduce a requirement for a teacher's license. Read the speech
  23. School, culture, environment and economy question period

    Frågestund · 11 September 2025

    • Argues that a successful schooling is a preventive factor against crime and social exclusion. Asks how the government will ensure that all students graduate from upper secondary school with complete grades. Read the speech
    • Argues that money for teaching materials is not enough if there is a lack of sufficient staff in primary school. Asks how the government will ensure sufficient resources instead of giving the tax money to tax cuts for the richest. Read the speech
  24. Foreign policy, education, healthcare and UNRWA funding

    Frågestund · 22 May 2025

    • Criticizes the government's decision to remove the supplement to the housing allowance. Argues that this affects economically vulnerable families with children and single parents who are forced to forgo food and medicine. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
  25. Legal certainty, healthcare, economy and infrastructure debate

    Frågestund · 8 May 2025

    • Criticizes that Försäkringskassan makes incorrect demands for repayment of sickness allowance even though activities are compatible with sick leave. Asks how the minister ensures that sickness allowance or sickness compensation is not withdrawn on incorrect grounds. Read the speech
    • Asks how far back in time it is reasonable to place retroactive demands on a person when Försäkringskassan has changed its assessment without the citizen having intended to cheat the system. Read the speech
  26. Temporary housing allowance extension and government tax cuts

    Svar på interpellationerna 2024/25:526, 546 och 568 om förlängning av det tillfälliga bostadsbidraget · 22 April 2025

    • Argues that the economic situation for single parents with low incomes is extremely serious. Criticizes that the government is phasing out the housing allowance and argues that the tax cuts do not compensate for the loss. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government for removing the housing allowance, which hits single parents hard. Argues that tax cuts do not compensate for the loss and asks what the government will do when children and mothers go hungry. Read the speech
    • Argues that the temporary housing allowance is an accurate way to reach the weakest households. Criticizes that the government is withdrawing the measure and asks what remains in support when expenses exceed income for working parents. Read the speech
  27. Government economic policy, tax cuts and family priorities

    Statsministerns frågestund · 10 April 2025

    • Asks whether the statement that the position of new national security advisor will not be advertised is correct. Criticizes the lack of transparency in the Government Offices' recruitment processes and emphasizes the importance of learning from previous scandals. Read the speech
  28. Food prices: Government response to inflation and tax cuts

    Svar på interpellationerna 2024/25:392, 458 och 477 om matpriserna · 18 March 2025

    • Criticizes the government for raising the high-cost protection for medicine while food prices are high. Argues that the market is not functioning due to oligopoly and wants the government to tax excess profits as well as demand transparency in pricing. Read the speech
    • Argues that Swedish households are affected by high food prices and criticizes Sweden for being uniquely bad in the world at acting against inflation. Asks the government if they share the view of reality that food prices are rising and demands measures against the food giants' record profits. Read the speech
  29. Labor market, migration, infrastructure and welfare debate

    Frågestund · 13 March 2025

    • Asks what the government is doing to ensure that Arbetsförmedlingen in Skellefteå has sufficient resources to handle Northvolt's bankruptcy. Points out that Arbetsförmedlingen has received reduced appropriations and that staff have been laid off during the government's mandate period. Read the speech
  30. Labor market policy and unemployment insurance debate

    Arbetsmarknadspolitik och arbetslöshetsförsäkringen · 12 March 2025

    • Criticizes the government's passivity and tax cuts that do not reduce unemployment. Proposes increased investment in labor market training, investments in infrastructure as well as a strengthened unemployment insurance. Also wants to investigate support for individuals in limbo between sickness insurance and Arbetsförmedlingen. Read the speech
    • Asks how tax cuts for high-income earners lead to more job opportunities. Criticizes the government's choice to prioritize tax cuts over investments in labor market training and industries with large needs. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's tax cuts for not improving the economy for ordinary people. Argues that most people are very eager to work and that the government is responsible for creating the conditions for this. Read the speech
  31. Pension system report: SD, M support, V propose higher pay

    Pensioner · 26 February 2025

    • Argues that pensioners need to be able to live securely and proposes that income pensions be increased to reach promised levels. Also proposes an Arnepension for strenuous occupations so that these can retire earlier. Read the speech
  32. Social policy, environment, labor market and school issues

    Frågestund · 13 February 2025

  33. Economic security for families: S wants 200 kr, V wants 400 kr

    Ekonomisk trygghet för familjer och barn · 11 December 2024

    • Asks if the member is satisfied that 15 percent of children live in poverty. Criticizes that the government and the Sverigedemokraterna are lowering the housing allowance for the weakest households while simultaneously giving large tax cuts to high-income earners. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that tax cuts do not benefit those who receive housing allowance. Argues that the government's reduction of the housing allowance makes people poorer and suggests that the housing allowance should instead be increased generally to combat overcrowding. Read the speech
    • Argues that many parents work but still cannot make the money stretch. Criticizes that the child allowance has been eroded and suggests that it be adjusted to correspond to today's price level. Asks why tax cuts for the richest are prioritized over an increased child allowance. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Read the speech
  34. Sickness insurance reforms: V wants 80% benefit, S cuts wait

    Ekonomisk trygghet vid sjukdom och funktionsnedsättning · 11 December 2024

    • Criticizes that the government has stopped investigations into improvements in the sickness insurance. Argues that the government has instead focused on investigating the removal of improvements that enabled longer sick leaves. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Sweden Democrats have deprioritized improvements to the sickness insurance despite previous demands. Criticizes that they now ignore the issue when their mandate was needed and argues that the Left Party has shown that they can improve the sickness insurance when they have governed. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government prioritizes tax cuts for the wealthiest instead of addressing the ongoing crisis within the welfare system. Argues that the underfunding leads to more people being signed off sick and asks how the member views this connection. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the proposed tax cuts because they do not benefit those who are signed off on sick leave due to poor working conditions. Argues that those on sick leave are hit twice as they receive low benefits while tax reliefs are targeted at those who work. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's priorities and argues that the sickness insurance is poorly functioning. Wants to abolish the quarantine deduction, raise the ceiling for sickness benefit to 80 percent, raise the compensation for job seekers and increase the appropriations to Försäkringskassan. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government and the Sweden Democrats for prioritizing incorrectly and letting households and healthcare suffer. Argues that the Centre Party is not proposing any improvements despite the sickness insurance functioning poorly. Read the speech
    • Questions whether the Center Party will support a government with faith and visions for the future or one that pits people against people. Argues that the Center Party will become irrelevant if they cannot answer which government alternative they prefer. Read the speech
  35. Occupational injury insurance: M and V debate new proposals

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:100 om arbetsskadeförsäkringen · 7 November 2024

    • Argues that the occupational injury insurance should be secure, legally certain, and equal. Criticizes the high evidentiary requirements for life annuity and asks when the government intends to take initiative so that the proposals in the investigation will be put on the table. Read the speech
    • Argues that the inquiry's proposal on automatic investigation would improve the system. Criticizes the long time limit for life annuity and wants it to be set to day 90. Argues that the insurance has unreasonable surpluses while the injured do not receive compensation. Asks if the government intends to implement the inquiry's proposal. Read the speech
    • Appeals to the Minister to follow the rules of procedure for interpellation debates. Asks whether the Minister considers today's order to be good since injured persons can lose income and asks what the government will do to ensure safety at work. Read the speech
  36. Government management of economy, infrastructure, and health

    Frågestund · 7 November 2024

    • Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government claims that cancer care is improving while healthcare is in a deep crisis. Asks how the minister intends to improve cancer care with the current budget. Read the speech
  37. Housing allowance supplementary grant phase out and indexing

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:845 om tilläggsbidraget i bostadsbidraget · 17 September 2024

    • Argues that the housing allowance is being eroded as it is not indexed. Criticizes the government's plans to phase out the supplementary allowance as it hits households with the smallest margins and single mothers hard. Asks if the intention is to completely phase out the supplementary allowance. Read the speech
    • Argues that the reduction of the supplementary allowance implies a reduction in income for low-income earners and single mothers. Criticizes that the housing allowance does not follow the price development and asks how the government views the housing allowance in the long term. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government is scaling back the housing allowance and argues that it means an income reduction for those with the smallest margins, such as single parents. Asks why the government does not introduce monthly reconciliations to facilitate things for households. Read the speech
  38. Government policy, EU cooperation, crime and social issues

    Frågestund · 30 May 2024

    • Asks when the government will act to prevent a healthcare catastrophe in Västernorrland. Criticizes that the government has prioritized tax cuts over healthcare, which leads to patient safety being threatened and people may die. Read the speech
  39. Abolishing compensation for high sick pay costs in Sweden

    Ersättning för höga sjuklönekostnader upphör · 27 May 2024

    • Criticizes the proposal because it leads to increased selection on the labor market and hits small companies extra hard. Argues that the government should develop incentives to counteract sick leave instead of abolishing the compensation and moves that the bill be rejected. Read the speech
  40. Social insurance design and health insurance effects debate

    (forts. från § 7) Socialförsäkringsfrågor (forts. SfU13) · 16 May 2024

    • Asks how the member views the inquiry into the sickness insurance. Argues that the inquiry's proposals imply a return to inhumane rules that applied before 2021 and criticizes how people with severe illnesses were previously excluded from insurance. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the investigation proposes a regression to rules that made sick people poor. Argues that the investigation focuses on costs rather than needs and asks how a system that does not provide security can be defended. Read the speech
    • Asks whether the Tidö parties agree on the issues being debated, especially in light of the current investigation. Also asks how the Christian Democrats view the investigation's proposal to tighten the flexibility in part-time sick leave. Read the speech
    • Expects the Christian Democrats to fight for a flexible sick leave now that the investigation is on the table. Asks how the Christian Democrats view the investigation which implies a regression of improvements in the sickness insurance. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Sverigedemokraterna ignore the sickness insurance despite promises of improvements. Argues that the investigation's proposals mean a rollback of improvements from 2021 that gave more people the opportunity to get healthy without being impoverished. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Sweden Democrats, despite their role in the government offices, pretend to be unaware of the investigation's significance. Asks why the party agreed to the investigation and if they will back down following criticism. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the investigation for implying a return to inhumane rules. Wants to abolish the quarantine deduction, income-index compensations, replace the rehabilitation chain with a step-by-step model and appoint a crisis commission for those affected. Read the speech
  41. Economic family policy: M, S, and L propose different reforms

    Ekonomisk familjepolitik · 17 April 2024

    • Asks what the Moderaterna want with the housing allowance in the long term. Argues that the function of the allowance decreases when the income ceiling is not adjusted and asks if the government considers the current development to be good. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the housing allowance is being phased out due to unchanged income limits and argues that compensations must follow the cost development to maintain their purpose. Argues that tax cuts have a redistributive effect in the wrong direction. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's policy because families with children have lost a lot in disposable income and because tax cuts do not help those who need it most. Argues that the government's policy creates insecurity by reducing benefits for those on sick leave and the unemployed. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Sweden Democrats for not keeping their promises regarding economic security. Argues that the government is not doing enough to combat inflation or facilitate things for families with children and asks what they will do to support households. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government for not doing enough to support families with children in the economic crisis. Proposes that the housing allowance should be permanently indexed and that parental leave should be individualized to increase equality. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government stands helpless in the face of rising unemployment and criticizes that they demand single parents to work more. Advocates for political reforms to facilitate things for families with children who cannot afford basic needs. Read the speech
    • Argues that policy must level economic inequalities and ensure that families with children can afford everyday life. Proposes that the child allowance and housing allowance be indexed to prevent them from being eroded and that children grow up in poverty. Read the speech
  42. Economy, defense, social policy and infrastructure debate

    Frågestund · 11 April 2024

    • Asks how the Minister for Social Affairs will ensure that families with children have a reasonable standard of living that gives children the opportunity for leisure activities. Points out that many parents with lower incomes have difficulty paying for leisure activities. Read the speech
  43. Climate policy, electricity, and health insurance debate

    Statsministerns frågestund · 4 April 2024

    • Criticizes that the government and the Sverigedemokraterna want to introduce stricter rules in the sickness insurance. Argues that this means a return to previous rules that lead to the sick being forced to take fictitious jobs despite doctors' assessments. Read the speech
  44. Healthcare capacity, labor market policy and social issues

    Frågestund · 21 March 2024

    • Asks how the minister intends to ensure that all children in Sweden can grow up with a reasonable standard of living since the economic space for families with children has decreased significantly and the contributions for cleaning help and shoe polishing hardly help. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
  45. Government management of healthcare, economy, energy and environment

    Frågestund · 14 March 2024

    • Asks whether the Minister for Finance considers it reasonable that the government's budget leads to increased differences between the regions. Argues that the government's and the Sweden Democrats' budget leads to large cuts and layoffs within healthcare. Read the speech
  46. Social security contributions for welfare and outdoor clubs

    Socialavgifter · 28 February 2024

    • Criticizes the government's investigation on the visibility of social security contributions and argues that it does not improve the security systems. Argues that reduced employer contributions are ineffective policy and demands that remaining exemptions be limited. Read the speech
  47. Municipal and regional economy and welfare financing debate

    Kommunala frågor · 28 February 2024

    • Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Argues that the government has actively chosen to prioritize something other than providing sufficient resources to the regions. Asks whether the government will act on its promise or if healthcare staff will be laid off due to reduced funding. Read the speech
  48. Care deduction: M wants 6 instead of 10 deductions per year

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:407 om karensavdraget · 27 February 2024

    • Criticizes that the working group's proposal is modest and that the care deduction affects different occupational groups differently. Argues that the deduction constitutes a real obstacle to staying home when ill and asks who is supposed to go to work despite being ill. Read the speech
    • Argues that the basic deduction leads to underutilization as people refrain from taking sick leave due to loss of income. Criticizes that it is unreasonable that persons who contribute to the sickness insurance lose wages when ill. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden is unique in the Nordic countries with sickness benefit deductions and criticizes that it means employees lose money when ill. Asks why women and public sector employees should bear the cost of the sickness day. Read the speech
  49. Sickness insurance and disability benefits: SD, S, and V views

    Ekonomisk trygghet vid sjukdom och funktionsnedsättning · 13 December 2023

    • Proposes to abolish the care deduction, raise the sickness benefit ceiling, and raise the compensation levels for activity and sickness compensation. Criticizes the government's and the Sverigedemokraternas policy and argues that the sickness insurance should provide economic security rather than pressing down sickness rates. Read the speech
  50. Economic security for families: SD, V, and S proposals

    Ekonomisk trygghet för familjer och barn · 13 December 2023

    • Criticizes the government and the Tidö parties for not doing enough against high prices and for letting households become poorer. Asks why an increased rutavdrag is prioritized over an increased child allowance for families with children. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government is lowering taxes for the richest instead of helping families with children. Argues that the government's policy has led to poor economic development and that they are not doing enough against inflation. Read the speech
    • Asks why the government is backing away from the goal of equal parenting. Argues that the legislative change risks creating a market for parental leave where nannies can claim compensation. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government for their reforms making households poorer and risking tearing apart the parental insurance. Argues that equality is best promoted through reserved days for fathers and criticizes that the government has chosen to exclude the transfer of parental leave. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government and the Sverigedemokraterna for passively letting inflation harm households and prioritizing tax deductions for the well-off instead of increased child allowance. Proposes a permanent increase of the child allowance by 400 kronor per child, a reform of the housing allowance that includes childless people as well as increased benefits in the parental insurance. Opposes the government's legislative change regarding the transfer of parental leave as it risks undermining equality and causing unforeseen cost increases. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government has not done enough to lower inflation. Argues that the government's policy has led to households being unable to afford food for their children and asks why the renovation deduction is prioritized over an increased child allowance. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government prioritizes the rot- and rut-deductions as well as tax cuts for high-income earners over families with children. Asks why the government and the Sverigedemokraterna prioritize those who already have the most over families with children who cannot afford food. Read the speech
  51. Transfer of parental leave benefits: M supports, V fears

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:66 om överlåtelse av föräldrapenning · 27 October 2023

    • Fears that market elements are creeping into the parental leave, that fraud will increase and that equality will deteriorate. Criticizes that the government is moving forward with a modified proposal that has not been sufficiently investigated. Asks if the minister sees risks of benefit fraud. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government's proposal risks worsening equality because there are no measures to reserve more days. Criticizes that the rules could open up for subsidy crime and gang criminality. Asks if the government sees risks that the costs could be higher than expected. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government prioritizes freedom of choice over equality. Argues that the proposal risks increasing benefit crime and that the government is not taking responsibility for ensuring that fathers take a greater responsibility for the children. Read the speech
  52. Research and development employer contribution ceiling raise

    Nedsättningen av arbetsgivaravgifterna för personer som arbetar med forskning eller utveckling - höjt tak för avdraget · 31 May 2023

    • Proposes approval of the Left Party's reservation. Criticizes the proposal as reckless towards the safety systems and argues that the cost is borne by the workers. Argues that the government subsidizes large companies instead of investing targeted funds in research in future industries. Read the speech
  53. Housing allowance increase for families with children

    Svar på interpellation 2022/23:308 om den tillfälliga höjningen av bostadsbidraget · 26 May 2023

    • Asks why the government does not allow persons with social assistance to receive the temporary housing allowance. Also asks if the government intends to make the increase permanent and what happens when the temporary increase expires. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government for implementing measures that drive up inflation instead of supporting the most vulnerable. Argues that it is problematic that the government does not announce what will happen with the housing allowance in 2024. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that place of residence determines whether one can afford food. Argues that the government leaves the responsibility for food poverty to civil society and demands that the government takes responsibility so that children and people do not have to starve. Read the speech
  54. Pensioners born in 1957: Economic situation and corrections

    Svar på interpellation 2022/23:274 om situationen för pensionärer födda 1957 · 26 May 2023

    • Criticizes the government for not having corrected the situation for pensioners born in 1957 despite several opportunities. Asks why the government blames inflation when they themselves have acted in ways that have increased it. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government only regrets the situation instead of acting against the punitive taxation that pensioners are affected by. Argues that the government has a responsibility to solve the problem and asks how they intend to do so. Read the speech
  55. Economic family policy: parental insurance and child poverty

    Ekonomisk familjepolitik · 4 May 2023

    • Argues that the temporary housing allowance should not be deducted from the social assistance. Asks why the government does not address this so that the most economically vulnerable can afford food. Read the speech
    • Argues that the housing allowance does not reach the people who are in greatest need. Criticizes that the social assistance is not sufficient given the current inflation and asks why the support is not increased with supplements for housing allowance. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government and the Sweden Democrats for not doing enough for families with children who are struggling with finances. Argues that the government has prioritized tax cuts for high-income earners over support for families with children. Read the speech
    • Argues that the tough economic situation hits ordinary families with children hard. Criticizes the government for not taking action and advocates for an increased child allowance with a good distribution profile. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's passivity regarding inflation and the lack of equality in the parental leave. Wants to index benefit levels, introduce an individualized parental leave, increase the child allowance and introduce monthly adjustments for the housing allowance. Read the speech
    • Rejects that the Left Party's proposals are unfunded and argues that they are a matter of priorities. Criticizes the government for prioritizing tax cuts for the richest instead of helping families with children. Read the speech
    • Argues that equality and the best interests of the child are not opposites because two present parents are good for the child. Proposes an individualized parental leave benefit. Criticizes the government's housing allowance as insufficient and argues that benefit ceilings risk throwing people out of the safety nets. Read the speech
  56. Energy, school, care and economy: S wants 60 TWh by 2030

    Frågestund · 27 April 2023

    • Criticizes the government's passivity in the face of high prices for food and necessities. Asks why tax deductions for cleaning help are prioritized over a proposed crisis child allowance. Read the speech
  57. Separations at State Institution Board youth homes: abuse

    (forts. från § 8) Avskiljningar vid Statens institutionsstyrelses särskilda ungdomshem (forts. SoU24) · 20 April 2023

    • Criticizes the government's insufficient state subsidies and argues that the compulsory care at Sis needs to be fundamentally reformed due to serious conditions and segregations. Wants the government to return with measures so that segregations shall cease completely. Read the speech
    • Argues that the party wants the dismissals to cease and criticizes that the Social Democrats have not stood behind this demand. Asks why the Social Democrats are not standing behind the demand that the dismissals should cease. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Social Democrats have not addressed the problems at Sis during their time in power. Wants extensive measures to stop the separations and reform the operations fundamentally, rather than just focusing on the individual cooperation. Read the speech
  58. Climate policy, economic conditions and goals in PM's question

    Statsministerns frågestund · 13 April 2023

    • Asks when the electricity support round two will be paid out and if it is delayed. Criticizes Ebba Busch's contradictory statements regarding the payments. Read the speech
  59. Government economic policy, inflation, welfare and energy

    Frågestund · 9 March 2023

    • Argues that pensions need to be raised instead of the retirement age. Criticizes that the Moderaterna and Socialdemokraterna voted for a tax shock for certain birth years and asks if the government considers it reasonable that 200,000 pensioners pay more in tax. Read the speech
  60. School, energy, economy, sports and social policy debate

    Frågestund · 16 February 2023

    • Criticizes that the government is acting slowly with electricity support to households and companies. Asks when electricity support to households in Norrland and companies in southern Sweden will be paid out. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
  61. Economic family policy and inflation measures in Sweden

    Svar på interpellation 2022/23:150 om ekonomisk familjepolitik · 14 February 2023

    • Read the speech
    • Argues that children are hungrier when they arrive at school and criticizes that the government is not taking sufficient measures for the most economically vulnerable. Advocates for an increased child allowance for single parents and asks if the government will take further measures. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government lacks measures for households that are struggling and that children go hungry. Asks whether the government will support families with children or if municipalities should receive more money for increased food costs. Read the speech
  62. Economic security for families: SD, S, and M debate proposals

    Ekonomisk trygghet för familjer och barn · 16 December 2022

    • Criticizes that the tax is lowered for the richest instead of helping single parents. Argues that the temporary housing allowance is insufficient when prices increase and that the equalizing factor of family policy is being eroded. Read the speech
    • Argues that the castle parties deliberately prioritize tax cuts for high-income earners over ordinary families. Criticizes that the policy for the rich means that people cannot afford food and heat and asks if it is reasonable that single mothers pay the price. Read the speech
    • Argues that increased flexibility in the parental leave and more double days can reduce fathers' responsibility for the children. Asks how the transfer of parental leave should be designed and criticizes that the proposal increases the gap between men's and women's lifetime earnings. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government's proposal means that men will have less responsibility for the family. Asks to whom the parental leave can be transferred and criticizes that the proposal increases the gap between men's and women's lifetime earnings. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's and the Sweden Democrats' priorities as they favor high-income earners at the expense of those with small margins. Proposes increased child allowance for single parents, an indexed basic level in the parental insurance as well as substantial supplements to the welfare system. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government distributes leisure cards instead of ensuring that people have enough money. Asks if it is reasonable that civil society has to make up for the fact that parental leave and child allowance are not sufficient. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's decision to lower taxes for high-income earners while ordinary families are struggling. Argues that the investigation of contribution ceilings and unclear qualifications leads to lower contributions and increased dependence on civil society. Read the speech
  63. Welfare, immigration and economy: S, KD and M debate measures

    Frågestund · 15 December 2022

    • Asks why the government prioritizes tax cuts for high-income earners over support for families with children. Criticizes that the government's broken promises regarding electricity and fuel prices have not improved the situation for people who are struggling. Read the speech
  64. Crime, infrastructure, economy, housing and climate debate

    Allmänpolitisk debatt · 19 October 2022

    • Argues that inequality in Sweden is increasing exponentially due to the government's tax policy and the "slottsavtal". Criticizes that the government prioritizes tax reliefs for the wealthy and benefit caps for the poor, which increases the risk of poverty and crime. Instead, wants to see a policy that reduces the gaps and raises the benefits in the safety nets. Read the speech

Source: The Swedish Parliament. Kammarkoll is an independent service.