← Everyone who has spoken in the chamber
Mattias Bäckström Johansson (SD)
What Mattias Bäckström Johansson has said in the chamber of the Swedish Riksdag, debate by debate. The lines under each debate sum up a speech; they are written and translated by AI in advance and may contain errors, so check against the speech.
Kammarkoll has the Riksdag's speeches from 26 September 2022 onwards; older debates are not included.
Anonymous influence campaigns and trust in democracy debate
- Criticizes that the debate aims to spread incorrect information and increase polarization. Argues that the party has been subjected to democratic abuses, such as attacks and shut-down websites, and wants to strengthen democracy and freedom of speech. Read the speech
- Argues that freedom of speech on social media is owned by private companies that prioritize commercial interests. Points out that parties have operated in gray areas due to mass reports from opponents and wants to limit the power of tech companies. Read the speech
- Argues that the Social Democrats themselves conducted similar activities during the election campaign. Criticizes the Social Democrats for spreading misleading information and requests concrete examples of what constitutes hate or disinformation. Read the speech
- Argues that the opponent has not been able to demonstrate hate or disinformation but instead contributes to a polarized debate. Points out that the Social Democrats themselves conduct corresponding activities and demands more honesty in the discussion. Read the speech
- Argues that the party has been limited in its ability to convey messages because accounts have been shut down. Wants to be a constructive force to create sustainable rules of the game and strengthen freedom of speech. Read the speech
- Argues that the state should reduce its ownership in media companies. Suggests that the parties work out agreements and legislation to limit the tech companies' power over political communication. Welcomes deeper discussions to find a way forward. Read the speech
- Argues that the party has been subjected to problems with political recruitment in both physical and digital environments. Wants to work for solutions through legislation and agreements but argues that the root causes of disinformation and hate are not being discussed. Read the speech
- Criticizes that the debate contributes to increased polarization and spreads incorrect information. Proposes legislation regarding freedom of speech towards tech companies as well as agreements between the parties on common rules of the game. Read the speech
- Argues that there are no bot accounts or disinformation in the comment sections. Instead wants to work constructively to remove incentives through legislation and agreements between the parties. Read the speech
- Argues that all parties must work together against hate and threats. Criticizes that other parties, for example the Socialdemokraterna, have used anonymous accounts in subsidiaries and welcomes legislation to strengthen freedom of speech. Read the speech
- Argues that the anonymous posts have primarily been of a satirical genre and have not contributed to increased polarization. Wants to find constructive ways forward through legislation and more discussions within the party secretariat. Read the speech
- Is prepared to look at all proposals to find a broad way forward. Argues that legislation should be linked to limiting the big tech companies' power over freedom of speech and political discussions. Read the speech
Source: The Swedish Parliament. Kammarkoll is an independent service.