Kammarkoll

Search everything said in the debates of the Swedish Riksdag

← Everyone who has spoken in the chamber

Aylin Nouri (S)

Member of the Riksdag · 98 speeches in 25 debates since 20 October 2022

What Aylin Nouri has said in the chamber of the Swedish Riksdag, debate by debate. The lines under each debate sum up a speech; they are written and translated by AI in advance and may contain errors, so check against the speech.

Kammarkoll has the Riksdag's speeches from 26 September 2022 onwards; older debates are not included.

  1. Human rights, rule of law, economy and crime debate in Riksdag

    Allmänpolitisk debatt · 14 October 2026

    • Argues that a functioning infrastructure is crucial for welfare, competitiveness, and total defense. Wants the state to regain control over railway maintenance to ensure efficiency and democratic control. Read the speech
  2. Infrastructure maintenance, aviation and Trafikverket tender

    Infrastrukturfrågor · 16 June 2026

    • Asks what improvements have actually been achieved regarding Trafikverket during the four years that Sverigedemokraterna have had influence over the infrastructure. Read the speech
    • Wants to strengthen the state's democratic control over infrastructure and demands that efficiency be prioritized over the lowest price. Criticizes that the government has not implemented reforms during the last four years and asks for concrete initiatives from Sverigedemokraterna. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government's response to cost control has been cuts instead of reforms. Asks what productivity and cost control the government has actually implemented and emphasizes the need for more capacity with stronger control. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the previous speaker did not answer the question of how productivity in the sector should be increased. Asks again what concrete proposals the Moderaterna have pushed through to increase productivity and innovation. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government's plan fails to build away bottlenecks and reclaim the maintenance debt. Wants broader agreements, strengthened cost control and that the state reclaims more control over critical infrastructure. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government only handles 10 percent of the maintenance debt on the railway. Argues that the railway must be upgraded to increase growth and resilience, and advocates for increased capacity for a robust Sweden. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government prioritizes roads at the expense of the railway. Wants a more balanced transport policy with increased capacity and faster maintenance. Criticizes the government for a lack of vision and for not strengthening Sweden's resilience. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that governments have not done enough for infrastructure and the maintenance debt. Argues that the government has continued the course change that was introduced earlier but that it is not enough to quickly expand capacity. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government has not presented any alternatives to solve the capacity debt. Criticizes that the major reforms of Trafikverket have been omitted and that the proposal for new main lines was stopped. Read the speech
    • Want to stop micro-management and procurement circus to increase productivity. Propose better state competition, to strengthen Trafikverket as a procurement actor and give the agency the opportunity to perform its own maintenance to increase expertise. Read the speech
    • Welcomes the government's work with ERTMS. Criticizes the government's management of the maintenance debt and the lack of alternatives for new main lines. Argues that the state must strengthen its own competence to streamline maintenance. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government's actions are cuts rather than cost control. Argues that decisions that withdraw necessary capacity create uncertainty and advocates for cross-bloc dialogue to create stability. Read the speech
    • Argues that better cost control requires a changed basic calculation for socio-economic profitability. Suggests that the procurement system be reformed through longer time periods and larger geographical areas to promote innovation. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Liberals' proposal only concerns withdrawing decided investments instead of building smarter or cheaper. Asks if the Liberals are proud that the national plan halves the resources for research and innovation. Read the speech
    • Asks how the Liberals view the national plan which involves a halving of the appropriations for research and innovation. Argues that the Liberals should not stand behind these billion-kronor cuts as they hinder the development of future sustainable transport systems. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden needs a transport system that can carry future growth, competitiveness, and preparedness rather than just maintaining today's system. Asks whether the current national plan fully meets Sweden's future needs. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government neglects the railway's needs and that the proposed maintenance rate is unrealistic. Criticizes the lack of concrete delivery and argues that instead of pitting the modes of transport against each other, one should invest in both roads and railways. Read the speech
  3. Railway maintenance investments 210 billion SEK until 2037

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:534 om underhåll av järnvägen · 12 June 2026

    • Welcomes more resources for railway maintenance, but argues that the government has not taken into account the need for robust infrastructure for total defense. Asks what concrete improvements in punctuality and capacity passengers and companies can expect during the next twelve years. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the level of ambition to repay the maintenance debt is too low and questions the realism of the plan to repay the remaining debt after 2037. Instead wants to build up Trafikverket's own competence, invest in specialized machinery and increase productivity. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government for a lack of willingness to cooperate and for the ambition level for railway maintenance being too low. Asks if the Minister is satisfied with only addressing approximately 10 percent of the maintenance debt during the next ten years. Read the speech
  4. Public transport subsidies: KD proposes 6.5 billion SEK

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:533 om stöd till kollektivtrafiken · 12 June 2026

    • Welcomes the government's initiative but criticizes that the measure is sudden after four years of increased prices and cuts. Asks for the government's long-term plan and vision for public transport after the temporary support. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government for having pressured the regions' finances and caused a cost crisis through tax cuts for the wealthiest. Argues that the proposal is temporary election pork and instead wants cheaper public transport as well as free travel for young people and students. Read the speech
    • Wants indexed government grants to the regions and higher allocations to the transport agreements to create long-term conditions. Asks for the government's long-term plan to increase public transport travel in Sweden. Read the speech
  5. Abolish introductory training for practice driving requirements

    Slopat krav på introduktionsutbildning för övningskörning · 22 April 2026

    • Argues that it is reasonable to remove the introductory training because it has not functioned well. Criticizes that the government has not considered Transportstyrelsen's proposal for a new supervisor training and demands a careful follow-up of the reform. Read the speech
  6. Railway and transport investments: SD, M and MP debate plans

    Järnvägs- och kollektivtrafikfrågor · 15 April 2026

    • Criticizes that the state is backing out of promises regarding infrastructure between Malmö and Helsingborg. Asks how the government defends leaving Skåne with substandard infrastructure and scrapped capacity that could have strengthened growth. Read the speech
    • Argues that the current government is failing Region Skåne and Sweden by not including the expansion of Maria–Helsingborg in the national plan. Asks if the speaker will give a promise that the section will be added back to the national plan. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Moderaterna are not in touch with reality and argues that the government's policy involves cuts in society-critical infrastructure. Asks if the speaker is satisfied with the situation. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government is implementing cuts to infrastructure and lacks a plan to manage the large maintenance debt. Argues that the government has scrapped plans for new main lines despite remaining capacity needs and that the current plan for maintenance lacks credibility. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's policy as an emergency brake for the railway and argues that the plan for the maintenance debt lacks credibility. Wants to expand capacity, strengthen preparedness through state maintenance and introduce free public transport for young people and students. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government has continued the Social Democrats' previous calculations of the railway. Emphasizes that the railway is a vital part of Sweden's resilience and that infrastructure policy is important. Urges the Christian Democrats to put populism aside and cooperate. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government has scrapped plans for new capacity and implemented practical cuts for the railway. Argues that the government is not taking responsibility for Trafikverket's national plan and refutes the claim that the agency cannot use more resources. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government lacks proposals that strengthen the conditions for public transport. Argues that the lack of resources for the regions and increased prices hit the Swedish people's economy hard. Asks why tax cuts for the richest have been prioritized over affordable public transport. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government has left the regions in a pressured situation and reduced public transport, which harms welfare and the climate transition. Wants to index grants to regions and proposes free public transport for young people and students. Read the speech
  7. Transport goal and climate direction: 2045 goal and inflation

    Svar på interpellationerna 2025/26:362 och 391 om transportmålet och Sveriges klimatinriktning · 13 April 2026

    • Criticizes that the government is changing the transport goal and creating uncertainty for investments. Argues that the government's decision has worsened the conditions for jobs and competitiveness while emissions are increasing. Read the speech
    • Asks if the transport goal remains firm. Criticizes that electrification has lost momentum, the scrapping premium has failed and that railway investments have been scrapped or delayed. Argues that unclear rules of the game make companies consider leaving the country. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government lacks a clear plan for transport and climate policy after four years in power. Argues that Sweden needs a new direction with public investments in railways and electrification to strengthen competitiveness. Read the speech
  8. EU Gigabit Infrastructure Regulation: No tacit approval

    Avvikande från bestämmelserna om tyst godkännande i EU:s förordning om gigabitinfrastruktur · 4 February 2026

    • Supports the government's proposal to deviate from tacit approval in court proceedings to ensure legal certainty and quality. Argues that the law must not lead to slow processes and demands that authorities and courts be given the conditions to meet the deadlines. Read the speech
  9. Cost control in state infrastructure projects and capacity debt

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:91 om kostnadskontroll i statens infrastrukturprojekt · 6 November 2025

    • Argues that the costs for Swedish infrastructure have skyrocketed due to weak cost control and the marketization of the system. Criticizes that the government is not doing enough and demands a holistic approach instead of individual assignments. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the minister incorrectly interprets the Social Democrats' position on procurement. Argues that Trafikverket needs competence for correct procurement and that risk reserves do not stop spiraling costs. Asks how the government will ensure that the cost control does not fall on municipalities and citizens. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government lacks sound overall approaches to tackle the skyrocketing costs and the enormous capacity debt. Criticizes that the proposals instead involve cuts in important investments that create jobs and growth. Read the speech
  10. Removal of objects in national corridors and budget cuts

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:44 om bortplockade objekt i nationella stråk · 24 October 2025

    • Criticizes the government's infrastructure policy as a historical betrayal that creates uncertainty and hampers growth. Argues that the cuts affect people's everyday lives and that the government lacks concrete proposals for building wisely. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government hides behind referral processes and commits a breach of promise by deprioritizing infrastructure projects. Argues that the planned increase in maintenance is too low and proposes an investment of 45 billion kronor more than the government. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government avoids responsibility by shifting the blame onto previous governments. Argues that removed objects harm housing construction and increase unemployment, and emphasizes that infrastructure is an investment that affects everyday life and the business sector. Read the speech
  11. Legal certainty, healthcare, economy and infrastructure debate

    Frågestund · 8 May 2025

    • Criticizes that the Transport Agency uses unreliable tests that have led to people losing their driver's licenses and jobs without any crime being committed. Asks why the government has not allowed the agency to review previous decisions and provide redress to those affected. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
  12. Railway role in total defense and maintenance funding debate

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:579 om järnvägens roll i totalförsvaret · 30 April 2025

    • Criticizes the government's complacent attitude and argues that the deferred railway lacks democratic control and readiness. Wants the state to regain control over the critical infrastructure and proposes an additional 750 million kronor for 2025. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Minister for evading their responsibility and argues that the government's maintenance budget is insufficient to pay off the maintenance debt. Proposes 45 billion kronor more for railway maintenance over the next twelve years. Read the speech
    • Argues that the enormous maintenance debt must be paid off rather than just being halted. Criticizes the government's lack of willingness to cooperate and argues that the infrastructure requires public ownership and democratic control instead of market experiments. Read the speech
  13. Healthcare, schools, children's rights and economic issues

    Frågestund · 27 February 2025

    • Criticizes that a person who posed a security risk was able to obtain a teaching license. Argues that the government must take more powerful measures to protect children and young people in school. Read the speech
  14. School funding and materials: S wants 1.8 billion SEK extra

    (forts. från § 10) Stärkt tillgång till läromedel (forts. UbU6) · 19 December 2023

    • Argues that free learning materials are crucial for equal education and criticizes the government's cuts in schools. Wants adult education and SFI to also be entitled to free learning materials and proposes that the state allocates more money to schools. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government moves money around and renames them as initiatives instead of making real investments. Criticizes that the state grant punishes municipalities that have taken the lead and argues that the government is cutting 2 billion kronor from the school. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government micro-manages the municipalities and forces through cuts through difficult state grant structures. Argues that the government in practice cuts back on schools despite alleged investments and proposes that an additional 1.8 billion be invested in school and education. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Sweden Democrats did not include free learning materials for students within municipal adult education and SFI in the bill. Argues that the party shows contempt for these forms of education despite its own previous statements. Read the speech
    • Argues that learning materials are extremely expensive and that the cost crisis persists. Wants free learning materials within municipal adult education at the basic level to prevent students from withdrawing from studies. Read the speech
  15. State funding for learning materials and textbooks for students

    Stärkt tillgång till läromedel · 19 December 2023

    • Argues that students need access to up-to-date teaching materials adapted to their needs. Asks why the proposal for free teaching materials for adult education and SFI is not included in the government bill and what is causing the delay. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the proposal does not include free learning materials for students in komvux and SFI. Argues that it is regrettable to accept negative effects for these students and asks why they are considered to have less need. Read the speech
  16. Disinformation, economy, crime and integration debate

    Statsministerns frågestund · 16 November 2023

    • Asks about what message should be given to the students at Eriksboskolan and whether the children will have to pay the price for the government's paralysis of action. Argues that the children are affected by gang violence and that leisure activities are being shut down due to reduced resources. Read the speech
  17. Reporting obligation for school staff and Convention on Child Rights

    Svar på interpellationerna 2022/23:423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 429 och 430 om anmälningsplikt för skolpersonal · 19 September 2023

    • Criticizes the government's policy as an authoritarian development where citizens' freedom and the principles of the rule of law are restricted. Asks if the Minister for Education can guarantee that teachers will not have to report children in the future. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Minister for Education has not answered questions regarding exceptions for the school. Argues that the investigation directives do not exempt any profession and declares that the Social Democrats will oppose the legislation. Read the speech
  18. Upper secondary school vocational education and compulsory study

    Gymnasieskolan · 20 April 2023

    • Criticizes that the Liberals do not value the vocational programs as highly as the theoretical ones. Argues that previous policy sent signals that vocational programs were a dead end and now questions the phasing out of the trade schools. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Liberals are pushing young people into vocational training as a dead end. Asks why the government has scrapped the pilot project with industry schools despite the competence being vital for Sweden and being in demand by the industry. Read the speech
    • Argues that upper secondary school is crucial for the labor market and emphasizes completed reforms regarding higher education eligibility, dimensioning, and subject grades. Wants to make upper secondary school compulsory, introduce compensatory resource distribution, reintroduce compulsory aesthetic subjects, and preserve the vocational schools. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Sweden Democrats' policy for sorting out students and creating a deeper class society by limiting general education in vocational programs. Asks why some students are not considered to deserve a complete upper secondary education. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Sweden Democrats' policy and argues that students choose educational programs that lead to jobs. Wants to facilitate the transition to upper secondary school and argues that the current grading system leads to students being sidelined. Read the speech
  19. Education funding and structure: L, S, and SD proposals

    Grundläggande om utbildning · 20 April 2023

    • Expresses concern regarding the government's actions concerning students' right to mother tongue instruction. Criticizes SD's rhetoric that mother tongue instruction would be harmful and asks if the government will yield to SD's demands. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Tidö Agreement and the government's desire to phase out mother tongue instruction is politically motivated rather than research-based. Asks if he can guarantee that the right to mother tongue instruction remains. Read the speech
    • Wants to ban religious independent schools and demands that society takes back control of the school from the market and religious forces. Criticizes the government's lack of resources and the Tidö Agreement's proposal for emergency schools. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Liberals' policy of creating a sorting school through acute and emergency schools. Argues that the government and the Liberals are irresponsible as they do not invest in resources despite the school's major challenges and increased costs. Read the speech
    • Points out that the Social Democrats have already introduced expanded powers for staff to handle disturbances of order. Criticizes the Liberals' support for sorting students and argues that the way forward is resources for preventive work. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the research used to justify the removal of mother tongue instruction is not statistically validated. Argues that religious influence does not belong in school and asks if forced religious influence is acceptable. Read the speech
    • Argues that the controls of religious free schools have been tightened but are not sufficient. Wants to ban religious free schools and asks if the Sverigedemokraterna are also willing to investigate Christian free schools that impose religious influence on children. Read the speech
  20. Palestine and Israel: Two-state solution and apartheid claims

    Svar på interpellation 2022/23:263 om Palestina och Israel · 28 March 2023

    • Read the speech
    • Asks the Foreign Minister how he views Prime Minister Netanyahu's statements regarding Jewish exclusivity to Israel and Palestine. Also inquires whether he will act for the Palestinians' right to exist. Read the speech
  21. Teachers' reporting obligation for undocumented children

    Svar på interpellation 2022/23:249 om lärares anmälningsplikt när det gäller papperslösa barn · 24 March 2023

    • Criticizes the government's proposal on the reporting obligation as self-contradictory and in conflict with the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Argues that the proposal places an enormous burden on teachers, threatens their professional ethics, and demands that the Minister for Education withdraw the proposal. Read the speech
    • Argues that the bill must be scrapped entirely because it forces public employees to report undocumented children. Criticizes that the proposal harms the work environment and professional ethics for teachers, which could lead to them leaving the profession. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the proposal places an enormous burden on pressured teachers and argues that it violates the Convention on the Rights of the Child as well as threatens safety. Wants the Minister for Education to immediately scrap the proposal and stop the investigation. Read the speech
  22. School funding: profit ban, funding norms and ownership

    (forts. från § 4) Riksrevisionens rapport Skolpengen - effektivitet och konsekvenser (forts. UbU12) · 22 March 2023

    • Criticizes the market school model for profit-seeking, segregation, and inefficient school funding that overcompensates independent schools at the expense of municipal schools. Wants to ban profit extraction, give municipalities a veto over independent schools, increase state grants to municipalities, and expand the equality grant. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Sweden Democrats are the guarantor of the market school. Criticizes that they vote against proposals that increase equality and asks how a ban on profit extraction could be considered a socialist school system. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Sweden Democrats do not have the right to criticize the Social Democrats since the Swedish National Audit Office confirms their criticism regarding the system's inefficiency. Urges the government to act to rectify the inequality in schools because they lack proposals in the Tidö Agreement. Read the speech
    • Argues that the market adjustments in schools have gone too far. Wants municipalities to have influence over the establishment of free schools because new establishments drain the municipal schools of resources. Read the speech
    • Rejects changing the word veto to increased influence and stands firm that the municipalities need a veto regarding freedom of establishment. Argues that the issue is already well-investigated and urges the government to prioritize the students' needs over the market companies' profit extraction. Read the speech
    • Asks how the Sverigedemokraterna view the Riksrevisionen's criticism of the current school funding system. Argues that the system is inefficient and leads to waste of tax money as independent schools are overcompensated. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Sweden Democrats only focus on the profit schools' right to profit instead of the children's right to education. Asks if the speaker means that the Swedish National Audit Office is against independent schools when municipal schools should be compensated for additional costs. Read the speech
    • Argues that municipalities lack influence over the long-term planning of friskolor, which leads to profit extraction and higher costs for municipal schools. Asks how they intend to handle the economic consequences for municipal schools after having voted no to increased influence. Read the speech
    • Argues that the criticism of the market school model is widespread and that heavy-weight institutions praised the government's previous proposal. Criticizes the Moderaterna for prioritizing the profit of school companies over the students and asks how they will handle the financial situation of municipal schools. Read the speech
  23. School fees: National Audit Office report on efficiency

    Riksrevisionens rapport Skolpengen - effektivitet och konsekvenser · 22 March 2023

    • Argues that the Liberals slowed down necessary reforms in the school area. Criticizes that they now welcome proposals that were previously voted down and wants to ask how many millions the independent school corporations should be allowed to take out before the investigation is considered finished. Read the speech
    • Corrects Fredrik Malm's historical description by pointing out that the government appointed a school commission. Argues that it was the Liberals who stalled necessary reforms and asks how much longer they will continue to bury reforms in investigations. Read the speech
  24. Religious free schools: ban to stop segregation or scrutiny

    Svar på interpellation 2022/23:23 om religiösa friskolor · 15 November 2022

    • Argues that religious independent schools violate children's right to an education based on scientific grounds and segregate students. Wants religious independent schools to be banned and asks if the government only sees Muslim independent schools as a problem. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government is not interested in dealing with religious independent schools that segregate and lack a scientific basis. Criticizes that the Tidö Agreement only focuses on Muslim independent schools and demands that religious independent schools be banned. Read the speech
  25. Foreign policy, security, school, and climate debate

    Allmänpolitisk debatt (forts. från prot. 11) · 20 October 2022

    • Argues that the government and the Moderaterna want to maintain profit extraction by increasing control and inspections. Asks how much control and bureaucracy it is reasonable to place on teachers in order to maintain the right to profit extraction. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Argues that it is the profit-driven friskolor that cause grade inflation. Criticizes that the Sverigedemokraterna have abandoned their previous ban on profit extraction and asks why they listen to the business community instead of the will of the people. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Wants to ban unlimited profit withdrawals from tax-funded schools as the pursuit of profit drains the school and increases segregation. Argues that marketization must be stopped through a holistic perspective where the focus lies on the students' learning instead of profit margins. Read the speech
    • Argues that market steering and profit extraction are the reasons why the school system is being torn apart. Wants to ban profit extraction, introduce a fair school choice, and fund the school in an equitable manner. Read the speech
    • Want every tax crown intended for the school to go to the school to improve learning and development. Argues that billions disappear out of the system and that the unfair school choice with queues creates a market system that must be abolished. Read the speech

Source: The Swedish Parliament. Kammarkoll is an independent service.