Kammarkoll

Search everything said in the debates of the Swedish Riksdag

← Everyone who has spoken in the chamber

Niklas Sigvardsson (S)

Substitute member · 236 speeches in 70 debates since 20 October 2022

What Niklas Sigvardsson has said in the chamber of the Swedish Riksdag, debate by debate. The lines under each debate sum up a speech; they are written and translated by AI in advance and may contain errors, so check against the speech.

Kammarkoll has the Riksdag's speeches from 26 September 2022 onwards; older debates are not included.

  1. Government policy on defense, agriculture, environment and education

    Frågestund · 11 June 2026

    • Criticizes that the government is dismantling popular education by cutting funding. Asks why the government chooses to weaken a unique resource that could strengthen civil defense. Read the speech
  2. Ten-grade system and national final exams to counter inflation

    Ett likvärdigt betygssystem · 8 June 2026

    • Asks how the Liberals plan to conduct the national final exam digitally without increasing the administrative burden for teachers. Argues that the current system for digital exams has failed and that it is difficult to conduct such an extensive exam digitally. Read the speech
    • Questions about the government's preparedness to handle administrative burdens. Argues that one should avoid locking in a national digital final exam before the system is secured in order to avoid organizational chaos and extreme workload for the staff. Read the speech
    • Argues that the new grading system is not sufficient to reduce the dropout rate of students and demands that the drivers of the market school also be addressed to counter grade inflation. Wants the system to be fair, reliable, and open more doors for young people. Read the speech
    • Is positive towards centrally administered tests to create equality in assessment across the country. Argues that dialogue with labor market partners is important to ensure that vocational programs provide the competence required for the future labor market. Read the speech
    • Argues that it is important for students to receive a secure education and good basic knowledge in order to be able to change jobs during their lifetime. Wants to continue cooperating with the industries and the labor market partners to find solutions that enable a good labor market. Read the speech
    • Wants to vote yes to the legislation for a ten-grade grading system. Argues that the Social Democrats would have worked for the system's long-term stability if they had been allowed to participate in the work. Read the speech
    • Want a broad parliamentary review during the implementation work to ensure a long-term agreement. Argues that it is important that the system holds over time as it affects generations of students. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Moderaterna countered the previous government's attempts to soften the F-limit. Points out that it was the Moderaterna who introduced the current grading system with a hard F-limit. Argues that the majority wants to tear down the school they themselves built up. Read the speech
    • Argues that bourgeois curricula and grading systems have been leading. Wants a school that values education and long-term knowledge as well as abolishing the hard F-limit to reduce the number of students being weeded out. Read the speech
  3. Teacher teaching and planning time regulation and admin burden

    Tid för undervisningsuppdraget · 4 June 2026

    • Wish to support the proposal to regulate teachers' teaching time, but requires that the government ensures responsible funding and implementation. Argues that the reform should have been designed through clearer dialogue with the labor market partners and requires follow-up of its effects. Read the speech
    • Argues that the municipalities have been forced to make adjustments due to inflation and budget deficits. Wants the state to take greater responsibility through sector grants and a new economic principle to inflation-protect state grants. Responds that the possibility for agreements within the Swedish model still exists. Read the speech
    • Does the Swedish model then defend that agreements between unions and employers create sustainable conditions. Wants to vote yes to the proposition on regulated working hours, but demands that the state does not cut the school's funding. Read the speech
  4. School support: L wants nationalization, S more equity funds

    Förbättrat stöd i skolan · 3 June 2026

    • Argues that proper and early support is needed in school. Asks how the Liberals will ensure that sufficient resources and staff are appointed so that the reform becomes a reality. Read the speech
    • Argues that the state needs to take greater responsibility for both the financing and the regulation of the school. Criticizes the government's proposal as hollow and demands more resources to hire more teachers, special education teachers, and special pedagogues. Read the speech
    • Welcomes the ambition to strengthen support but criticizes that the government is removing the purpose clause stating that students should develop as far as possible. Argues that the reform requires sufficient resources, staff, and long-term funding to have a real effect in the classroom. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Social Democrats during their period in government improved the school's support measures by introducing guarantees for early interventions. Suggests that more money for the equity grant and more teachers and special educators are needed to reach out broadly. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Sweden Democrats bear the responsibility for the current school development. Wants to introduce a sector contribution to regulate the school and stop the pursuit of profit, as well as prioritize the school by not lowering taxes for the richest. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Moderaterna do not want to settle the issue of profit-seeking in schools. Asks why the government wants to purify the mandate in the Education Act and if it is because independent schools do not want to provide support and stimulation. Read the speech
    • Argues that the major problem is that students do not receive enough knowledge. Criticizes that the Moderaterna do not mention the leakage of funds to independent schools and wants the Education Act to clearly establish that all students shall be given support to reach as far as possible. Read the speech
  5. New curricula: subject knowledge, student influence and sex education

    Nya läroplaner - för en stark kunskapsskola · 3 June 2026

    • Argues that the proposal weakens the school by removing important parts regarding basic values. Criticizes that the Liberalerna have backed down and toned down work regarding sexuality, consent, and honor violence, which is necessary to give students tools to free themselves from oppression. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government is moving sex education to specific subjects, which could make it easier for parents to avoid the education. Argues that all teachers and school staff should have the tools and knowledge to be able to conduct tough conversations about basic values. Read the speech
    • Welcomes the ambition for a strong knowledge school but criticizes that the government weakens the school's democratic mission by removing questions about sexuality, consent, and honor-based violence from the overarching goals. Argues that teachers should decide on the choice of methods and wants to preserve the students' influence as part of the school's democratic mission. Read the speech
    • Argues that the teacher decides on the implementation of teaching, subject areas, and assessment. Explains that sex education should be handled both through subject-specific curricula and as a fundamental part of the school's values where all adults have a responsibility. Read the speech
    • Argues that a strong teacher role can be combined with student influence through dialogue to create a safe school. Suggests that honor-related violence and oppression be explicitly written in as incompatible with democratic values in the opening parts of the curriculum. Read the speech
    • Argues that questions of sexuality, consent, and honor-based violence are sensitive and should be included in the overarching parts of the curriculum. Asks for the government's draft curricula to see how these subjects are highlighted. Read the speech
    • Argues that it is important that adults in school can take responsibility and have tough conversations. Criticizes that the government's changes to the curriculum and teacher education risk causing these issues to disappear completely. Read the speech
    • Argues that inequality in school has increased and that school must function as a counterfactor to create equality. Claims that it is possible to combine a strong teacher role with the students' right to influence. Read the speech
    • Argues that there is no conflict of objectives between a strong teacher role and student influence. Argues that students should be given influence through dialogue and discussion, as research shows that rules are followed better when students are given responsibility. Read the speech
  6. School safety and study environment: resources, order, mobile-free

    (forts. från § 12) Bättre förutsättningar för trygghet och studiero i skolan (forts. UbU22) · 27 May 2026

    • Argues that safety and study require adult presence, resources, and reasonable class sizes. Criticizes the proposal for emergency schools on contract and argues that expectation documents create unnecessary administrative burden for teachers. Read the speech
    • Agrees that rules of order should apply to the entire school unit. Asks why a new expectations document is needed if it is already to contain school rules, as it risks increasing the teachers' documentation burden. Read the speech
    • Asks how the reasoning regarding different cultures relates to the expectations document. Argues that the expectations document entails a large workload for the teachers and questions the need for two separate but similar documents. Read the speech
  7. Public access for school providers and simplified rules

    Offentlighetsprincipen med lättnadsregler för enskilda mindre huvudmän i skolväsendet · 21 May 2026

    • Criticizes that the relief rules are too broad as they cover a large part of all independent schools. Argues that it is not about small village schools but about significantly larger schools. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the relief rules constitute a restriction of the principle of public access. Argues that market logic should not drive the school and that the legislation does not provide sufficient insight into the companies' calculation models and marketing. Read the speech
    • Argues that the principle of public access is a step in the right direction but criticizes that the government builds in overly generous exemption rules. Wants the principle to apply to all principals without exceptions for trade secrets and that komvux should also be covered. Read the speech
    • Argues that the bill does not cover the entire school's operation when it comes to confidentiality for trade secrets. Criticizes that the proposal does not fully describe how recruitment and profit generation work and argues that market logic should not carry heavy weight in the school. Read the speech
    • Want more parts of the friskolor's activities to be open to democratic scrutiny. Argues that tasks for school activities should be open to inspection to ensure that common tax funds go to the children and the staff. Read the speech
    • Argues that independent schools should operate on the same terms as publicly run schools to ensure that the funds go to the students. Criticizes the exemption rules and argues that even schools with 450 students should be able to provide information without exceptions. Read the speech
    • Argues that municipal schools and independent actors are not treated in exactly the same way due to room for trade secrets. Asks whether the Moderaterna will expand the principle of public access so that it applies equally to both. Read the speech
  8. Transition study support financing and administration rules

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:379 om omställningsstudiestöd som inte utnyttjas · 24 March 2026

    • Argues that money risks being frozen because the government is not providing sufficient funds. Asks how the minister is acting to increase the appropriations and prevent more applications from being rejected before the autumn. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government does not allocate sufficient funds to CSN to secure processing capacity. Asks what the minister intends to do to increase and maintain the processing rate so that more can be granted support in time. Read the speech
    • Confirms that the figures are better than a year ago. Argues that CSN warns of worsened processing figures if additional funds are not allocated. Asks how the minister acts to counteract this during the autumn of 2026. Read the speech
  9. School quality, teacher shortage and independent schools

    (forts. från § 11) Övergripande skolfrågor och Grundläggande om utbildning (forts. UbU7 och UbU8) · 4 March 2026

    • Asks how the Sverigedemokraterna are working to stop religious free schools and argues that they are still indebted to an answer on how to lure teachers back to the school. Read the speech
    • Argues that religious influence, regardless of belief, should not be part of the Swedish school system. Wants to stop confessional free schools because it is a general problem rather than an individual religious problem. Read the speech
    • Argues that it is incorrect to distinguish between confessional free schools based on religious belief since irregularities exist at several schools. Wants to ban confessional schools regardless of religion because school should not be based on religious belief. Read the speech
    • Argues that the school should be based on science and proven experience rather than a confessional basis. Wants to ban all confessional schools regardless of religious belief to ensure that all children can be accommodated together. Read the speech
  10. School reforms: national class sizes, profit limits, knowledge

    Övergripande skolfrågor och Grundläggande om utbildning · 4 March 2026

    • Argues that the school system has been characterized by a market logic where schools act as companies to attract students. Asks how the Liberalerna intend to implement their policy to address the independent school system during the upcoming mandate period. Read the speech
    • Asks how the Liberals plan to implement their policy with the current government base. Argues that the profit frenzy in the independent school system must be abolished so that school fees go to students, teachers, and staff. Read the speech
    • Requests approval for specific reservations. Argues that the school's problems stem from systemic errors where equality has deteriorated and the pursuit of profit on school premises consumes resources intended for students and teachers. Proposes increased transparency, separate reporting, limitation of overcompensation to independent schools, and a new grading system that does not lock students in. Wants to strengthen early interventions, reduce class sizes, improve the work environment, and ensure students' democratic influence. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Moderaterna are now in opposition to the school policy they themselves have implemented over several decades. Asks why the party now does not want to be held accountable for the school system they have driven. Read the speech
    • Argues that it is the teacher who directs the teaching and emphasizes the importance of student influence. Criticizes the Moderaterna for having introduced the latest curricula and considers the profit-seeking in the independent school system to be the greatest ideological experiment. Read the speech
  11. CSN payment delays: technical issues vs. underfunding

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:305 om CSN:s utbetalningsproblem · 16 February 2026

    • Argues that payment delays create a private economic crisis for students and criticizes the government for not having listened to the opposition or student organizations. Asks for a clear plan and concrete measures to ensure future payments. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government has not listened to CSN's need for resources and has not taken sufficient account of the agency's budget constraints. Asks the minister what additional measures are being taken and what the consequence analyses look like ahead of next year's budget work. Read the speech
    • Argues that the payment delays are due to the government not providing CSN with the requested resources. Criticizes the government for being reactive rather than proactive and argues that they cannot explain how future payments will be able to handle the pressure. Read the speech
  12. Road 40 motorway standards between Jönköping and Ulricehamn

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:143 om motorvägsstandard på väg 40 mellan Jönköping och Ulricehamn · 6 February 2026

    • Argues that road 40 is a critical bottleneck where highway standards are required to increase traffic safety, strengthen the labor market and facilitate for the business community. Urges the minister to prioritize the expansion of the section. Read the speech
    • Want to highlight the importance of the highway section between Jönköping and Ulricehamn. Argues that the section is of national and international importance for growth, defense, and preparedness. Read the speech
    • Argues that the railway is an important part of the infrastructure to create robustness. Suggests that the national debt should be used for large investments instead of tax cuts. Wants the government to answer yes to the question of whether national road 40 receives motorway standard. Read the speech
  13. Electricity prices, housing, crime and migration policy

    Frågestund · 5 February 2026

    • Asks how the government can defend that household electricity bills continue to increase despite promises of lower electricity prices and that electricity prices have reached record levels. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
  14. Student financial aid: L, S, and M debate system reforms

    Studiestöd · 4 February 2026

    • Wish to vote in favor of reservation 7. Criticizes that the government has not allocated sufficient resources and argues that a student support review must be based on students' actual living conditions. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Sweden Democrats avoid discussing how the paid police training affects the funding of studies. Argues that one must view all funding of studies as a whole and investigate long-term consequences for other professional groups. Read the speech
    • Argues that crime can also be combated through preventive work with more teachers. Wants to strengthen high school students' finances and emphasizes that Social Democratic policy puts more money in the wallet than the government's policy. Wants a long-term review of the student grant system in broad parliamentary consensus. Read the speech
  15. Student financial aid: L, S, and M debate sustainability

    Studiestöd · 10 December 2025

    • Criticizes the government's policy for having removed the equalizing goal in the student support system and for not prioritizing families with children. Argues that student support should be a tool for social justice and proposes that the student grant for upper secondary school students be increased. Read the speech
    • Argues that a well-considered review of the student support system is important. Is prepared to review the conditions for students with children or who become ill so that they can complete their studies. Read the speech
    • Wants to review the regulatory framework for the study start support to make it more functional. Argues that the government should invest in and adjust existing systems instead of scrapping them without replacing them, especially considering the high unemployment. Read the speech
  16. English-language school teacher identification exemption review

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:124 om legitimationsundantaget för engelskspråkiga skolor · 8 December 2025

    • Criticizes the government's passivity and argues that the ambition to abolish the licensing exemption has fizzled out. Asks why the minister appears to have shifted on the issue despite previous statements on the importance of Swedish teacher licensing. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's passivity and lack of will to abolish the identification exemption for English-language schools. Wants an investigation to be appointed immediately to ensure equal requirements and quality in schools. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's vague answers and argues that the exception for English-language schools must be abolished to ensure equality. Wants all teachers in Swedish schools to have a Swedish teacher's license regardless of the school's profile. Read the speech
  17. SVT terrestrial network 1.5 billion SEK and CBAM impact

    Frågestund · 20 November 2025

    • Criticizes the government's priorities as cuts in public education and closed rehearsal spaces make the musical journey impossible for young people. Asks how cultural policy is to create future artists when rehearsal spaces are being closed. Read the speech
  18. Transition study support and CSN processing times conditions

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:65 om omställningsstudiestödets framtida förutsättningar · 4 November 2025

    • Criticizes the government for being slow and not sufficiently proactive when the authority and applicants have signaled that the process is moving too slowly. Asks if the minister is confident that the allocated funds are sufficient for the processing during 2026. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government is not providing the 33 million SEK that CSN needs to guarantee decisions before the start of studies. Criticizes that the minister is confident despite the agency having warned of longer processing times and reduced interest in the support. Read the speech
    • Argues that it is crucial that eligible individuals receive support in a timely manner. Expresses concern that CSN does not receive sufficient funds to provide notification before the start of studies and criticizes the government for not providing the money that is needed. Read the speech
  19. School, culture, environment and economy question period

    Frågestund · 11 September 2025

    • Argues that student unions and student associations are incredibly important for the students' study time. Asks how the student unions can continue their work after the grants are expected to decrease by 20 million kronor. Read the speech
  20. Higher education funding, academic freedom and student health

    Högskolan · 12 June 2025

    • Asks how the Liberals and the chair of the Education Committee will act to stop cuts to student influence. Argues that student unions and associations demand that student influence be secured to ensure high-quality teaching. Read the speech
    • Argues that a vote for the budget bill would mean 30 percent less money for the student unions. Criticizes that previous funds were eroded during the Liberals' time in government and emphasizes that student influence is a guarantee for the quality of education. Read the speech
    • Wishes to approve reservation 9. Argues that the university should promote equality, growth, and social benefit through accessibility and high-quality competence. Proposes a new resource allocation model to strengthen teacher-led time, decentralized education, and student health. Criticizes the government's and Sverigedemokraternas planned cuts to the student unions' funding and influence. Read the speech
    • Argues that student influence is an important part of the higher education institutions' activities and a basis for democratic education. Asks how the Sverigedemokraterna will act during the autumn budget negotiations when the student unions risk almost 30 percent in cuts. Read the speech
    • Argues that 25 million kronor from previous increases should continue to be used for the student unions' activities. Asks which specific professional educations are to be de-academized and requests clarifications to reduce anxiety and create security for students. Read the speech
  21. Student grant increase: S wants 200 kr via new bank tax

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:613 om höjning av studiebidraget för gymnasieelever · 22 May 2025

    • Argues that families with children and young people are struggling financially due to high food costs and rent increases. Criticizes the government for prioritizing high-income earners over families with children and asks how the minister intends to increase the student grant in the future. Read the speech
    • Argues that the student grant has been eroded by inflation over the last four years. Wants to increase the student grant by 200 kronor every month to strengthen households' purchasing power and ability to support themselves. Read the speech
    • Argues that budgets can be financed through other priorities and new sources of revenue. Suggests that the banks should pay for an increased student grant of 200 SEK per month to counteract the erosion of the grant. Read the speech
  22. Unemployment in Jönköping County: stimulus and education

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:554 om åtgärder mot den ökande arbetslösheten i Jönköpings län · 9 May 2025

    • Criticizes the government's initiatives on summer jobs for being insufficient and argues that the roof deduction is symbolic politics that does not solve the industrial crisis. Asks whether the government's measures will truly meet the needs of young people to become employable. Read the speech
    • Wants a clearer commitment to summer jobs so that young people can get a foot in the door of the labor market. Argues that large investments in infrastructure and railways were needed to create jobs and expand the labor market region. Asks how the minister ensures that young people get a foot in the door of the labor market. Read the speech
  23. Government policies on foreign affairs, schools and climate

    Frågestund · 24 April 2025

    • Criticizes that the investigation does not propose a real profit ban but only limitations. Argues that the proposal benefits large actors and asks why the government wants profit to remain the driving force in the school. Read the speech
  24. Upper secondary school funding, structure and grading system

    (forts. från § 10) Gymnasieskolan (forts. UbU12) · 12 March 2025

    • Asks questions about the government's cuts in work life knowledge despite increasing fatal accidents and sick leaves. Argues that a secure labor market requires a high general knowledge level and industry-specific educational components with clear goals. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government is removing sections on labor market knowledge and work life knowledge in social studies. Argues that this lowers the general competence level for those students who do not study vocational programs and reduces the ambition for the education. Read the speech
    • Argues that both public and private schools should be included in the dimensioning. Wants to abolish the grade F to avoid hard boundaries and instead use a compensatory assessment that considers the student's knowledge as a whole. Read the speech
    • Argues that profits from the school should go to education rather than tax havens. Wants to use dimensioning to lower the high youth unemployment. Criticizes that an F in Swedish, math, or English excludes students from upper secondary school. Read the speech
  25. Upper secondary school vocational training and school rules

    Gymnasieskolan · 12 March 2025

    • Wants to limit school marketing to prevent misleading information. Argues that the sizing of upper secondary education must take place to meet the needs of the labor market and asks how the government is following the implementation. Read the speech
    • Argues that both vocational and upper secondary preparatory programs must be qualified. Emphasizes that dimensioning is important to meet regional competence needs and that independent actors should be included in the dimensioning. Read the speech
    • Wants a compulsory upper secondary school until the age of 18 and regulation of the finances of independent schools (friskolor) to prioritize pedagogical quality over profits. Argues that upper secondary school must be dimensioned according to the needs of the labor market and advocates for strengthened and modernized vocational education. Read the speech
    • Argues that a two-year vocational school is a dead end because it is not buildable. Proposes instead buildable vocational packages that enable continued studies and makes compulsory upper secondary school a solution to increase employability. Read the speech
    • Argues that the dimensioning of educations is positive and that adjustments are needed at national, regional, and municipal levels. Emphasizes that vocational programs are good educations and that the reintroduction of higher education eligibility signals that they are as good as national programs. Read the speech
  26. Student support system review: L wants redesign, S wants inquiry

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:365 om aviserad översyn av studiestödssystemet · 18 February 2025

    • Argues that the student support system should rest on an equal basis. Proposes a broad parliamentary review to create long-term conditions. Asks whether the Minister for Education will ensure a broad parliamentary anchoring of the new system. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Argues that the principle of a general and generous student support must remain. Advocates for a broad parliamentary anchoring to create a stable system that can endure over time and changes of government. Read the speech
  27. Young people's labor market vulnerability and government measures

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:354 om ungas utsatthet i arbetslivet · 14 February 2025

    • Argues that young people are overrepresented in deaths and injuries at work. Criticizes the government for having removed teaching on work environment and labor law in upper secondary school and desires an analysis of future education levels. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government is making a reprioritization that removes important labor market skills from the upper secondary education. Points out that the word work life in the new syllabi stands among so many other points that it will most likely disappear. Read the speech
  28. School staffing, class sizes, crime, and alcohol sales

    Frågestund · 30 January 2025

    • Asks how the government plans to solve the future teacher shortage when there are simultaneously proposals that the number of new places in teacher education should be significantly reduced. Read the speech
  29. Student support: M, C, and MP debate grant changes

    (forts. från § 12) Studiestöd (forts. UbU7) · 29 January 2025

    • Criticizes that the government has cut the funding to the folk high schools. Argues that clearer mandates and more money for folk high schools would have made more people educable and employable via the study start support. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
  30. Student financial aid: L review, S expand grants, KD phase out

    Studiestöd · 29 January 2025

    • Argues that the student support system is stable and has broad support across party lines. Asks if the government agrees that a broad parliamentary review of the system should be carried out. Read the speech
    • Clarify that the transition study support (omställningsstudiestödet) stands outside the upcoming review. Argues that the rules for student grants must be stable and long-term sustainable. Wants the investigation to be broadly anchored and parliamentary. Read the speech
    • Motion to approve reservation 4. Criticizes the government's plans for cuts and the abolition of the study start support. Proposes that the target group for the study start support be expanded to combat unemployment. Read the speech
    • Argues that there are funds available to increase the student grant for upper secondary school students. Admits that the money ended up in the wrong budget item due to a lack of resources in the Government Offices, but emphasizes that there is a surplus of 775 million kronor. Read the speech
    • Want to give all upper secondary school students an extra 200 SEK in study grant. Argues that the Social Democrats prioritize grants to families and students over tax cuts for high-income earners. Read the speech
    • Confirms the Swedish National Audit Office's criticism but suggests a review of regulations and subsidy levels to better reach the target group. Wants the study start support to be changed so that more people with a short educational background can gain access to regular education and enter employment. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's and the Kristdemokraternas will to phase out the study start support. Argues that the study start support is necessary for individuals to become educable and get an opportunity for work, and emphasizes that the state has a shared responsibility with the individuals. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Sweden Democrats' demands for investments in the countryside are not present in the government's proposal. Also asks whether write-offs of student loans would affect the number of educational places and questions the government's words regarding the countryside given the closures of service offices. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the reduction in fuel prices is primarily due to world market prices. Argues that public services in the countryside are deteriorating under the current government and asks how strongly the demands for the write-off of student loans are actually being driven in the government negotiations. Read the speech
  31. Student financial aid: L, S, M, and SD debate support levels

    Studiestöd · 11 December 2024

    • Argues that the student grant for upper secondary school students has not been increased since 2018. Wants to increase the grant by 200 SEK to support families with children and asks why the Liberals prioritize high-income earners instead. Read the speech
    • Supports the government's increase of apprentice compensation. Instead wants to prioritize families with children and upper secondary school students by enabling an increase of 200 kronor per month for upper secondary school students. Read the speech
    • Proposes approval of the opposition's reservation. Criticizes the government's cuts in student financial aid and the abolition of the student start support. Proposes increased grants for families with children and upper secondary school students as well as an expanded target group for the student start support. Read the speech
    • Explains that the Socialdemokraterna propose 200 kronor more in study grants for upper secondary school students. Argues that this is a clear prioritization to stand up for families with children instead of the Moderaterna's tax cuts. Read the speech
    • Argues that the budget option secures the finances of families with children. Points out that there are funds for high school students to receive 200 kronor more per month, in contrast to the tax cuts for high-income earners proposed by the opponent. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Sweden Democrats want to abolish the study start support. Argues that the support is important so that people with a short educational background can pursue education, become self-sufficient, and contribute to society. Read the speech
    • Argues that student support should be developed so that people can get jobs. Criticizes that the government does not provide more labor market policy measures or support for individuals to be able to support themselves. Read the speech
    • Want to increase the study support from CSN for upper secondary school students by 200 SEK per month. Also want to increase the child allowance by 200 SEK per month to protect families with children. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Moderaterna avoid discussing substantive policy differences. Emphasizes that the Socialdemokraterna want to increase the child allowance and the study grant for upper secondary school students to support families with children. Read the speech
  32. Campus-based education: S wants double investment for centers

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:109 om campusbaserad utbildning · 14 November 2024

    • Argues that access to quality higher education regardless of location is crucial for Sweden's development. Wants a national strategy to be developed to strengthen both campus-based and decentralized education as complements to each other. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the minister focuses on distance education instead of place-based education. Argues that resources can be released by avoiding tax cuts for the richest and emphasizes the importance of education reaching everyone in the entire country. Read the speech
  33. Transition study support reform: S, KD, and SD debate efficiency

    Ett effektivare omställningsstudiestöd · 13 November 2024

    • Supports the bill to strengthen individuals' position in the labor market. Criticizes the government for dragging its feet and postponing the entry into force, which is seen as a betrayal of the individuals waiting for a decision. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government acted too late and backed out. Criticizes that the government is only now providing the funds that CSN needed earlier and that the entry into force could have occurred earlier. Read the speech
    • Argues that the transition study support was a common victory for workers and that the risks were accepted by the parties that voted for the proposal. Criticizes the government for not being sufficiently proactive and for not allocating more money to CSN. Read the speech
  34. Electricity support for municipalities and regions EU law

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:125 om uteblivet elstöd till kommuner och regioner · 5 November 2024

    • Criticizes that regions and municipalities are still waiting for promised electricity support despite previous promises. Argues that the government has not taken sufficient initiatives to resolve the situation and demands to know what measures will be taken. Read the speech
    • Argues that regions and municipalities are being punished for carrying out important activities. Urges the government to find other solutions to compensate them for the lost revenues. Read the speech
  35. Climate policy, forestry, school, and military ties to Israel

    Frågestund · 17 October 2024

    • Criticizes the failure of the market school model and that students are affected by too few teaching hours. Argues that the government is lagging behind and asks when the profit-driven operation in schools will be abolished. Read the speech
  36. Higher education places: L prioritizes quality and tech

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:35 om regeringens minskning av antalet platser i högre utbildning · 15 October 2024

    • Want the Minister for Education to reflect on whether decentralized education at learning centers is included in the concept of campus-based education. Criticizes that the government's priorities risk reducing the number of study places far away from the university locations. Read the speech
    • Argues that the focus should be on high-quality teaching and highlights the possibility of distance education in a social context. Wants the minister to explain the government's prioritization of payment per full-time student for technical education versus full-year performance for humanities. Read the speech
  37. CSN processing times: government measures and student grants

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:4 om CSN och handläggningstider · 1 October 2024

    • Criticizes that the government has missed opportunities to act proactively to shorten processing times. Asks what "greater impact" means for the 500,000 other student aid recipients who experience difficulties in receiving decisions in time. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government has not prioritized sufficiently to shorten processing times for all student aid recipients. Argues that students have difficulty getting in contact with CSN during the start of the studies and asks what the government considers to be acceptable deteriorations. Read the speech
    • Argues that students must be able to rely on receiving their support quickly and efficiently in order to be able to pay rent and course literature. Criticizes the government's nonchalant and incorrect priorities and thanks the staff at CSN for their hard work. Read the speech
  38. Higher education: STEM investment, academic freedom and budget

    Högskolan · 18 April 2024

    • Argues that students should be able to choose courses based on both the needs of the labor market and their own preferences. Asks for an explanation regarding the education minister's planned cuts to independent courses and which courses are considered to be of a hobbyist nature. Read the speech
    • Asks what types of independent courses are to be reduced at the country's educational institutions. Argues that it is illogical that MP Malm avoids answering the question of which courses are to disappear. Read the speech
    • Proposes approval of reservations 1 and 6. Argues that access to higher education is unevenly distributed and advocates for investments in learning centers, student health, and a more flexible course offering with short part-time courses. Criticizes the government's proposal regarding independent courses as a threat to academic freedom and a trend towards political micro-management. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden needs to become better at enabling higher education for everyone. Wants the government to talk more about broadened recruitment to create a clearer focus on enabling studies throughout the country. Read the speech
    • Wants to continue broadening recruitment to higher education, especially for foreign-born. Argues that investments in STEM subjects and improved study and career guidance are required to attract more people to different career choices. Wants to blur the boundary of who reaches higher education. Read the speech
    • Asks how the Moderaterna view the value of independent courses and if they share the government's view on reducing the number because too many are considered to be of a hobbyist nature. Points out that the Minister for Education's thoughts contradict previous statements about fewer political finger-pointing. Read the speech
    • Asks how students should finance independent courses. Argues that the university should not only be an education factory for profitable courses but also offer education and opportunities to broaden their horizons. Read the speech
    • Asks which universities are to lose their title or if higher education institutions are to be closed. Also asks how many universities the Sweden Democrats wish should lose their university status. Read the speech
    • Argues that the new universities conduct very good research despite uneven resource allocations. Criticizes that Stenkvist paints a picture of conflicts regarding quality, as highly cited research exists at all institutions. Read the speech
    • Agree that the student unions perform important work. Criticizes that the government plans to withdraw 20 million kronor from their funding and asks how the Kristdemokraterna view this. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government plans to reduce the funding of student unions by up to 20 million SEK from 2026. Wants the money to be included in the upcoming budget negotiations to avoid cuts to the unions' important work. Read the speech
  39. Gang violence, school cuts and sentencing debate in Riksdag

    Frågestund · 18 April 2024

    • Asks the Minister for Education on what basis the government bases the claim that independent courses have been significantly expanded. Criticizes the Minister for Education for presenting facts that do not hold regarding the proportion of independent courses. Read the speech
  40. Examination services for distance students and municipal centers

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:572 om tentamensservice i hela landet · 9 April 2024

    • Argues that a lack of examination seats and high fees create major obstacles for distance students. Wants the government to take action to enable examinations across the country so that more people can obtain their degrees. Read the speech
    • Confirms that physical exams are important to ensure knowledge in a time of increased AI use. Argues that a lack of exam seats in metropolitan regions hinders distance studies and wants the state to work towards enabling remote examinations. Read the speech
    • Argues that it is important that people can study and be examined from all over the country. Proposes increased cooperation between educational institutions and that municipal learning centers be legally secured to enable remote examinations. Read the speech
  41. Transition study support and regulatory simplifications debate

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:541 om omställningsstudiestödet och regelförenklingar · 9 April 2024

    • Argues that the government must increase the pace of regulatory simplifications because tens of thousands of individuals risk not receiving notification in time. Criticizes that the government is postponing the Council on Legislation review, which delays the processing and affects those waiting for support. Read the speech
    • Argues that the average processing time is still too long and criticizes the government's slow pace of work regarding regulatory simplifications. Asks what the minister is doing to further speed up the process so that 10 billion kronor do not go to waste. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
  42. Learning centers: 50 million SEK annual investment and costs

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:555 om resurser till landets lärcentrum · 19 March 2024

    • Argues that learning centers are important to provide access to education for many people. Criticizes the government's policy as counterproductive as the state grant has returned to the original level despite a worsened labor market. Asks what the minister intends to do to develop the possibility of studying throughout the country via learning centers. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's policy for not expanding education in line with the need and for the fact that the municipal learning centers are being burdened financially. Asks what the government intends to do to develop the possibility of studying throughout the country. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Minister for Education has not answered how the learning centers shall be developed. Emphasizes that learning centers are important for offering education near the place of residence and helping people to transition in the event of unemployment. Read the speech
  43. Student financial aid: CSN processing times and loan waivers

    Studiestöd · 6 March 2024

    • Argues that it should not matter whether one is poor or rich to be able to study. Criticizes the long processing time of 170 days which prevents people without financial muscles from starting education. Asks what the government is doing to shorten the processing time. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government and the Liberals for not being quick enough in allocating resources to CSN. Argues that the government could have implemented the requested regulatory simplifications during the current year instead of postponing them. Read the speech
    • Argues that student support is an important freedom reform and wants the possibility of driver's license loans to be reintroduced. Criticizes the government for not providing sufficient funds to CSN and for delaying regulatory simplifications. Read the speech
    • Argues that the support has a good purpose but should be adjusted so that more people find out about it and can take part in it. Points out that it is not the system that is failing, but that the disbursed funds were insufficient. Read the speech
    • Argues that broad proposals are needed to get more people into work through education. Suggests that the system be adjusted so that more people get the opportunity and attention regarding the support for a driving license. Read the speech
  44. Social bias in higher education and measures to counter it

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:398 om social snedrekrytering till högre utbildning · 27 February 2024

    • Argues that the government is showing a reduction in ambition regarding education for all. Wants the higher education institutions to do more to reduce social bias in recruitment and requests clarification on what they can do. Read the speech
    • Want the government to ensure high-quality and equitable education at all educational institutions. Argues that social skewed recruitment risks becoming social skewed education if resources are not distributed fairly so that students from homes unfamiliar with studies do not receive a poorer education. Read the speech
    • Argues that high-quality and research-linked education should be available at all higher education institutions in the country. Wants individuals with the same prior knowledge and grades to have the same opportunities for higher education and that the government prioritizes good access to high-quality education. Read the speech
  45. Labor market knowledge in upper secondary school curricula

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:366 om arbetsmarknadskunskap i gymnasieskolan · 16 February 2024

    • Criticizes that the government has removed labor market knowledge from the content of social studies. Argues that this means that knowledge about the Swedish model is being deprioritized and asks whether a consequence analysis of the risks has been carried out. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government's prioritization of removing the concept of working life from the subject's purpose means that labor market knowledge is being deprioritized. Criticizes that hundreds of thousands of students in higher education preparatory programs risk not receiving sufficient education in labor market knowledge. Read the speech
    • Argues that knowledge of the labor market risks disappearing in upper secondary school. Appeals to the government to make a new decision that gives teachers clearer guidance and priorities in order to provide young people with knowledge about the Swedish labor market. Read the speech
  46. Healthcare financing: state vs region responsibility and budget

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:301 om sjukvårdens finansiering · 23 January 2024

    • Argues that healthcare is suffering from a crisis due to the government's policy. Criticizes that the government advocates for national tax cuts while regions are forced to raise taxes to maintain healthcare. Read the speech
  47. Student support and transition study support proposals

    (forts. från § 6) Studiestöd (forts. UbU2) · 14 December 2023

    • Criticizes the Sweden Democrats for not acting when the applications exceeded the calculations. Argues that the Social Democrats added money and wanted to expand the capacity, and asks why the Sweden Democrats failed to provide money and assignments to CSN. Read the speech
    • Argues that the high application rate is positive. Criticizes the government for not having taken a position on the regulatory simplifications required for the automation to be implemented. Asks when the decision on these regulatory simplifications will be announced. Read the speech
    • Argues that the budget means that CSN receives barely half of the requested funds. Asks how the opposing party views the fact that one billion kronor goes to waste and that 10,000 people risk not receiving student support. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government is not acting quickly enough to improve the transition study support. Argues that CSN lacks the necessary resources to handle the cases, which affects other student aid recipients. Asks how the government intends to proceed. Read the speech
  48. Government economic policy, welfare, crime and tax cuts

    Frågestund · 14 December 2023

    • Argues that Swedish households are having a hard time and are becoming poorer. Asks how the government will act to lower food costs and help households afford their Christmas food. Read the speech
  49. Student financial aid: grant increases and social justice goals

    Studiestöd · 14 December 2023

    • Criticizes that the Liberals are removing the objective formulation that the student support system shall level differences and contribute to social justice. Asks why they consider it dangerous to retain this objective formulation. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government is removing the goal of social justice and equalization. Argues that it is important that the student support system and the education system have social justice as an overarching goal. Read the speech
    • Proposes approval of the reservation regarding the new goal for the student support system. Criticizes that the government is removing the goal of social justice and argues that the government is stalling on providing CSN with the funds they require. Wants the government to act proactively and give CSN the money that is needed. Read the speech
    • Argues that goal formulations are important and that words have meaning. Criticizes that the goal of increased social justice is removed, which risks worsening the fulfillment of the goals and affecting the role of the student grant system. Read the speech
    • Expresses concern about what happens to different parts of the student support system when the goal formulation is changed. Wants the student support system to act as a balancing factor and work for increased social justice. Read the speech
  50. Housing construction and timber industry measures in Sweden

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:241 om åtgärder för att öka byggandet och rädda träindustrin · 11 December 2023

    • Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's policy as failed and argues that the region does more for the timber house industry than the government does. Argues that the government should provide direct support to the industry here and now. Read the speech
  51. New railway between Gothenburg and Boras planning debate

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:143 om planering av ny järnväg mellan Göteborg och Borås · 11 December 2023

    • Criticizes the government for actively opposing new main lines that connect labor market regions. Asks why it is considered difficult to facilitate the future expansion of a new main line between Borås and Jönköping. Read the speech
    • Argues that the railway provides national and international benefits as well as strengthens the connection between Gothenburg and Stockholm. Emphasizes that the investment is important for preparedness and the green transition. Asks what will happen with a main line between Borås and Jönköping. Read the speech
  52. School policy and grading system: L, C, and S debate changes

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:270 om regeringens skolpolitik och betygssystemet · 11 December 2023

    • Argues that the grading system cements inequality and that the constructed cut-off point between E and F contributes to mental ill-health. Criticizes the government for blocking investigations into changing the construction of the F grade and asks how they intend to solve the issue. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government does not increase the state grants sufficiently for the municipalities to be able to finance necessary measures. Asks what the Minister for Education intends to do to reduce the disparity between primary school and upper secondary school. Read the speech
  53. Transition study support coordination and CSN funding

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:181 om samordning av omställningsstudiestödet · 23 November 2023

    • Argues that the government is shirkng responsibility by placing too much on CSN. Requests concrete assignments for other agencies and argues that the government should use the budget and appoint a coordinator to improve the administration. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government does not answer which assignments other agencies have received and argues that cooperation between agencies is not functioning. Suggests that the agencies be given more resources and requests the government's view on CSN's rule simplifications. Read the speech
    • Want the government to involve the opposition more clearly in the work on the reform. Requests a prompt handling of the regulatory simplifications to help the individuals who are waiting for a decision. Read the speech
  54. Försäkringskassan management grant and government economic plan

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:109 om Försäkringskassans förvaltningsanslag · 14 November 2023

    • Argues that Försäkringskassan needs more funds to handle the large response to the transition study support. Asks which impact assessment is being made and whether the processing times for SGI will remain long. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government must act quickly regarding the increased pressure of applications for transition study support. Asks what the Minister is doing to ensure that the state's commitment regarding the main agreement is fulfilled. Read the speech
  55. Crime, healthcare, education and authority roles debate

    Frågestund · 26 October 2023

    • Argues that shock-increased rents for educational institutions threaten the quality of education and research environments. Asks the Minister for Education what is intended to be done so that research and teaching are not cut due to increased rental costs. Read the speech
  56. Student support system goal and social justice focus

    (forts.) Svar på interpellation 2023/24:71 om målet för studiestödssystemet · 17 October 2023

    • Criticizes that the Minister for Education does not answer questions about the goal of the student support. Hopes that the government backs down from the proposal and maintains the goal that the student support should be equalizing and contribute to social justice. Read the speech
    • Argues that words and goals have significance and that student support must be equalizing and contribute to social justice. Criticizes that the government's and the Sverigedemokraternas policy does not include this prioritization. Read the speech
  57. Student support system goals and social justice debate

    Svar på interpellation 2023/24:71 om målet för studiestödssystemet · 17 October 2023

    • Criticizes that the government and the Sverigedemokraterna propose to change fundamental goals that have been agreed upon for over 20 years. Argues that it is remarkable that the government wants to remove the goal of contributing to increased social justice. Asks why the government considers that the student grant should not work for social justice in the future. Read the speech
  58. Reporting obligation for school staff and Convention on Child Rights

    Svar på interpellationerna 2022/23:423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 429 och 430 om anmälningsplikt för skolpersonal · 19 September 2023

    • Criticizes the proposal on the reporting obligation as it conflicts with the teaching profession's professional ethics and the child's right to education. Asks how the minister intends to conduct a dialogue with trade unions and whether it is the view of the Sverigedemokraterna or the Liberalerna that applies. Read the speech
    • Notes that trade unions within the school system are genuinely concerned about the proposal and argues that it creates a lack of trust. Cites union representatives who call the proposal populist symbolic politics. Read the speech
    • Argues that teachers should be able to focus on education and upbringing instead of acting as border guards. Emphasizes that school staff express concern over how difficult the profession will become if they are forced to make reports. Read the speech
  59. Folkbildning funding and adult education guarantees

    Svar på interpellation 2022/23:341 om folkbildning till alla grupper · 1 June 2023

    • Argues that cuts are still being made in adult education despite the additional appropriations. Criticizes the minister for not proposing measures to strengthen the folk high schools and argues that the government does not prioritize popular education. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government has prioritized income insurance for high-income earners over securing the right to adult education. Asks how the Minister for Education will ensure that more people get the opportunity to enter the workforce through the folk high school. Read the speech
  60. Transition study support and CSN resources debate

    Svar på interpellationerna 2022/23:339 och 347 om omställningsstudiestödet · 1 June 2023

    • Criticizes the government's management of the transition student grant and the lack of additional funding to CSN. Asks what the minister will concretely do so that CSN can manage the processing or if the government must admit that they cannot fulfill the commitment. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government does not address the distressing situation at CSN where case officers are overworked and the overtime budgets are full. Asks how the minister will ensure that CSN receives the resources needed to handle the high volume of applications. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government cannot guarantee that CSN receives the necessary resources. Argues that thousands of people risk not receiving their support due to slow processing and urges the government to act. Read the speech
  61. Folk high school funding and role as a second chance

    Svar på interpellation 2022/23:292 om folkhögskolan som en andra chans · 14 April 2023

    • Criticizes that the government's initiatives do not reach the Social Democrats' proposals and do not affect the folk high schools. Asks what the minister intends to do to strengthen the folk high schools and ensure their opportunity to give people a second chance. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's autumn budget for having led to cuts and the loss of places at folk high schools. Argues that more places were needed during the recession to secure the supply of skills and asks what the minister intends to do to strengthen the folk high school's opportunities. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government allows funding for vocational schools to disappear despite the focus on skills supply. Argues that the Sweden Democrats' influence creates concern for the folk high school's future and that the government parties have not acted sufficiently to protect the system. Read the speech
  62. School quality, work principle and marketization debate

    Frågestund · 30 March 2023

    • Argues that the marketization of schools inevitably leads to grade inflation. Asks how the minister will act to ensure that teachers do not receive lower salaries because they give fair grades. Read the speech
  63. Student financial aid: grant increases and rural debt cuts

    Studiestöd · 23 February 2023

    • Want the government to review the student support system and the grant levels as a whole. Asks how the Liberals will work to strengthen students' economic opportunities during the current tough times. Read the speech
    • Argues that the transition study support is an important system that has come about through negotiations. Asks what initiatives are being taken to maintain the level of ambition and ensure that CSN is able to process all applications. Read the speech
    • Proposes approval of reservation 1. Argues that the grant component of the student support needs to be significantly increased to increase social justice. Proposes improved part-time sick leave for sick students, a review of the study start support as well as that the transition study support should not be limited to shortage occupations. Read the speech
    • Argues that the transition study support [omställningsstudiestödet] should strengthen the individual's position on the labor market and not be limited to shortage occupations. Emphasizes that even persons in shortage occupations should be able to apply for support to further develop themselves or change careers. Read the speech
    • Argues that the transition study support (omställningsstudiestödet) is one of the best in the world and enables transition in mid-life. Wants to follow up on the government's implementation and asks how the Moderaterna act in the budget negotiations regarding CSN's requirements for funds. Read the speech
    • Asks how the Sverigedemokraterna will act in negotiations with the government to ensure that the level of ambition in the implementation of the transition study support is maintained. Read the speech
    • Asks how the government will proceed with the transition study support. Argues that the Sweden Democrats should clarify their position regarding shortage occupations and points out that the parties express a common concern regarding the implementation. Read the speech
    • Asks how the Christian Democrats view the intentions in the agreement and how they will work to ensure that the intention of the agreement and the legislation is implemented. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government places too much weight on the labor market's needs and shortage occupations in the transition study support. Argues that students and universities are good at finding matching themselves and that the support should focus on workers' rights rather than companies' advantages. Read the speech
  64. Transition study support: L says accuracy improving, S wants expansion

    Svar på interpellation 2022/23:182 om omställningsstudiestödet · 21 February 2023

    • Argues that the support is important for wage earners' future position on the labor market. Criticizes that CSN interprets the legislation too strictly and asks how the government is working to ensure that the implementation follows the intentions of the agreement. Read the speech
    • Want the implementation of the transition study support to be as good as possible. Asks whether the government intends to follow up on CSN's budget request of 46 million kronor to meet the current level of ambition. Read the speech
    • Argues that the transition study support (omställningsstudiestöd) is a unique and important reform for lifelong learning. Wants the reform to be expanded so that more people can participate and requires that there are sufficient study places and resources. Read the speech
  65. More training places for dentists and competence supply

    Svar på interpellation 2022/23:176 om behovet av fler utbildningsplatser för tandläkare · 14 February 2023

    • Criticizes the Minister for Education for the answer lacking ambition and for the government lacking insight into the skills shortage. Argues that the government's cuts in adult education are worrying and asks how they intend to meet the challenges with their budget. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's austerity policy by showing that the state support for vocational higher education is being reduced. Instead wants to invest offensively in education policy to meet the skills supply and demands answers on whether the figures are correct. Read the speech
  66. Ukraine support, Archer artillery, school burden and fishing

    Frågestund · 19 January 2023

    • Argues that the equivalence of learning materials is too poor. Asks how the government plans to implement the proposals in the Learning Materials Inquiry since these are missing from the submitted list of propositions. Read the speech
  67. Student financial aid: L, S, and C debate system design

    Studiestöd · 20 December 2022

    • Argues that it is important that there are places for everyone who wants to study with transition study support. Asks where the students who are to study with the transition study support shall be accommodated. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's cuts in higher education, adult education, and folkbildning. Asks how the increased number of applicants will be able to obtain study places and how students in the coming periods will be affected by these decisions. Read the speech
    • Argues that the student support system is a crucial part of the welfare model that enables freedom and lifelong learning. Wants more people to be able to support themselves without help from relatives and proposes a review of the student start support. Read the speech
    • Expresses joy that the Sweden Democrats have changed their opinion regarding the study start support. Asks if it is possible to review the levels so that more can participate in the support in the future. Read the speech
    • Welcomes that investments are being made for people far from the labor market. Argues that the study start support creates opportunities for self-sufficiency and integration and wants to negotiate to strengthen the position of study support for these groups. Read the speech
    • Argues that it is positive that the transition study support has been introduced and that one must be prepared to increase the appropriations. Simultaneously asks where all students are supposed to go with the current budget. Read the speech
    • Argues that lifelong learning is important and that it is positive that more people can study at a mature age. However, criticizes the budget proposal which reduces the appropriations to adult education and universities of applied sciences by over 1.8 billion. Read the speech
  68. Teacher education centralization: quality, supply and places

    Svar på interpellation 2022/23:42 om centralisering av lärarutbildningen · 29 November 2022

    • Read the speech
    • Argues that the government's work with supplementary pedagogical education and national professional programs strengthens teachers. Emphasizes that UKÄ's reviews effectively ensure quality and that regional educations are crucial for retaining staff throughout the country. Asks if the minister plans to phase out educations at specific educational institutions. Read the speech
    • Wants to increase throughput and have more qualified teachers in all classrooms. Criticizes the minister for avoiding the question of the localization of teacher education and argues that the announcement creates uncertainty for the country's educational institutions. Asks if the minister will take initiatives that eliminate programs at specific educational institutions. Read the speech
  69. Alcohol policy, infrastructure, housing, school and corruption

    Frågestund · 10 November 2022

    • Asks what the government means by its statement regarding adjusting the transition study support and whether the labor market partners can rely on the government standing by the state's commitment. Read the speech
  70. Foreign policy, security, school, and climate debate

    Allmänpolitisk debatt (forts. från prot. 11) · 20 October 2022

    • Criticizes that the Tidö Agreement only mentions Muslim independent schools. Argues that children also suffer in Christian independent schools and asks what should be done for these students. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government lets the Sverigedemokraterna rule the Tidöavtalet. Argues that it is distressing that the party that is supposed to unite the country includes formulations about extremism in schools with a Muslim profile. Asks why the rights of Christian independent schools are prioritized over the children's right to equal education. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Moderaterna, as the largest party in the government, are responsible for the policies in the Tidö Agreement. Criticizes that the government makes a distinction between Muslim and Christian independent schools. Read the speech
    • Wants to ban religious independent schools to ensure a school free from religious influence. Argues that the school should be based on scientific grounds and proven experience where all children are allowed to develop freely. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Wants to stop the pursuit of profit in the independent schools and proposes that schools should instead focus entirely on scientific basis and proven experience. Argues that minorities' right to practice their culture has been taken into account in previous propositions. Read the speech

Source: The Swedish Parliament. Kammarkoll is an independent service.