← Everyone who has spoken in the chamber
Björn Petersson (S)
What Björn Petersson has said in the chamber of the Swedish Riksdag, debate by debate. The lines under each debate sum up a speech; they are written and translated by AI in advance and may contain errors, so check against the speech.
Kammarkoll has the Riksdag's speeches from 26 September 2022 onwards; older debates are not included.
Aquaculture regulations: KD, S, and V debate simplification
- Welcomes that the regulatory framework for aquaculture is simplified by having environmental impact assessed solely according to the Environmental Code. Argues that sustainable fish farming can protect wild stocks and create jobs in rural areas. Read the speech
Fisheries policy: Baltic Sea stocks and quota distribution
- Argues that the current policy has favored large-scale fishing at the expense of small-scale. Wants to move out the trawling limit, pause large-scale fishing and expand infrastructure to increase the local processing of fish. Read the speech
- Answers yes to the question of taking responsibility. Means that the Social Democrats and the Moderates in Torsås take responsibility for both electricity production and fishing, and emphasizes that both parties agree on the negative effects of the osprey's expansion. Read the speech
- Argues that both his and his opponent's party bear responsibility for the failed fisheries policy. Urges cooperation to save the herring stock and explains that the Minister for Rural Affairs' voting behavior may have been due to the risk of being excluded from negotiations. Read the speech
Bottom trawling ban in marine protected areas: SD, V, C views
- Asks what has made the Sweden Democrats realize that a clear ban is needed and if they are ready to prioritize environmental protection over short-term profits. Read the speech
- Read the speech
- Read the speech
- Read the speech
- Welcomes the government's proposal but moves for approval of reservation 4 to extend the ban to areas outside the trawling limit. Argues that exceptions should be granted sparingly and that the government should initiate negotiations with EU countries. Read the speech
- Rejects the claim that the Moderaterna have pushed the Socialdemokraterna forward on the issue. Argues that he is working for the relocation of the trawling limit and a trawling ban according to a congress decision in order to promote coastal fishing. Read the speech
- Read the speech
- Read the speech
- Read the speech
Hunting and wildlife management: wolf population and predators
- Proposes approval of reservation 14. Wants to strengthen voluntary efforts, proposes an equal number of hunters and landowners in moose management groups and wants stricter penalties for intentional overshooting. Argues that the wolf population should be reduced to between 170 and 270 individuals and wants to streamline the rules for protection hunting. Wants to reduce the wild boar population and proposes license hunting for cormorants as well as license hunting for seals to recover fish stocks. Argues that semi-automatic rifles with a military appearance should not be allowed for hunting. Read the speech
Government priorities: tax cuts, coastal protection and healthcare
Fishing restrictions in Natura 2000 areas and marine zones
- Argues that the government has put forward a balanced proposal that protects biodiversity while simultaneously promoting a sustainable fishing industry. Wants to promote and develop the fishing industry in the short and long term. Read the speech
Labor market, energy, food and social issues in Riksdag debate
Funding of cooperation agreements and infrastructure in Sweden
- Asks whether the minister will act to secure the operating support for the Stångådalsbanan. Argues that the railway is an important part of the countryside that risks losing its support due to a lack of commercial conditions. Read the speech
- Argues that the region's budget is finalized and that the operating support for Stångådalsbanan risks being withdrawn. Repeats the question of whether the minister will act to secure the operating support for the railway. Read the speech
Government tax cuts: impact on economy and welfare
- Asks about what trade-offs have been made between tax cuts and resources for school and healthcare. Also asks whether people affected by accidents, illness, or unemployment actually get to benefit from the government's tax cuts. Read the speech
- Notes that not everyone will benefit from the tax cuts. Criticizes that the government prioritizes the well-off over society-sustaining professions and asks if the government believes that tax cuts for high-income earners increase growth more than higher wages for healthcare staff. Read the speech
- Questions for clarification regarding the claim that everyone receives a tax cut. Argues that there is an ideological dividing line between prioritizing tax cuts over public investments and advocates for taxation based on ability to pay. Read the speech
Reduction obligation for petrol and diesel and audit report
- Criticizes that the Sweden Democrats carried out the removal of the reduction obligation without conducting any impact assessment. Asks how the party intends to resolve the current commitments when they choose to remove the reduction obligation. Read the speech
- Asks whether the Sweden Democrats stand behind the ideas in the climate action plan to increase the reduction obligation to reduce demand for fuel. Expresses concern over future fuel prices and the lack of biofuel production for the countryside. Read the speech
- Expresses concern over the government's radical reduction of the reduction obligation which increases emissions and risks environmental fines. Proposes "Sverigebränslet" to create stability and reach the goals through a predictable blending of biofuels. Read the speech
- Read the speech
- Argues that the previous level for the reduction obligation is not feasible. Suggests that a feasible solution must be found that secures domestic production and keeps costs reasonable to gain public acceptance for the transition. Read the speech
- Argues that the Social Democrats have not shifted in their basic principles or distribution policy. Denies that the party is not taking responsibility and emphasizes that the policy has been reconsidered after the National Audit Office [Riksrevisionen] concluded that the previous plan was not sufficient. Read the speech
- Stands for the reduction obligation to secure future prosperity. Argues that the total cost is more important than the price at the pump and that a lack of domestic production leads to expensive import costs and future penalty fees. Read the speech
- Means that it is clear to workers who is running the government. Expresses concern over the government's actions and the need for domestic production and asks how the companies are to get solutions. Read the speech
- Argues that business representatives cannot bear investments in new production if the reduction obligation is lowered by 15 percent. Asks how the Moderaterna plan to secure domestic production of biofuels if it disappears. Read the speech
- Read the speech
- Expresses reflections regarding the parts of the climate action plan that raise fuel prices. Asks whether the Liberalerna have reached an agreement with the Sverigedemokraterna on the implementation of the policy, as it lacks broad consensus and the Socialdemokraterna have had no insight. Read the speech
Source: The Swedish Parliament. Kammarkoll is an independent service.