Kammarkoll

Search everything said in the debates of the Swedish Riksdag

← Everyone who has spoken in the chamber

Morgan Johansson (S)

Member of the Riksdag · 239 speeches in 43 debates since 14 December 2022

What Morgan Johansson has said in the chamber of the Swedish Riksdag, debate by debate. The lines under each debate sum up a speech; they are written and translated by AI in advance and may contain errors, so check against the speech.

Kammarkoll has the Riksdag's speeches from 26 September 2022 onwards; older debates are not included.

  1. Sweden's foreign intelligence service reorganization and threats

    Sveriges utrikes underrättelsetjänst · 12 August 2026

    • Asks how Aron Emilsson addresses the criticism of the rapid timeline for the reform. Argues that the head of the military intelligence service has warned of risks with carrying out the change so quickly. Read the speech
    • Argues that the military intelligence service and the Security Service warn of great risks with the rapid pace of change. Asks if they approved the timeline despite these concerns from the security actors. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden has a high-quality intelligence service that must be maintained. Criticizes the government's rushed timeline for the reorganization and warns that it risks deteriorating intelligence activities ahead of the election. Read the speech
    • Argues that he is not prepared to commit to a timetable now as the necessary information is missing. Criticizes that the sitting government is committing to the date of January 1 and argues that this is the government's responsibility. Read the speech
    • Argues that the bill concerns legislative changes for a new agency rather than the decision to start it. Points out that there is a lack of information to assess whether the timeline of January 1 is feasible. Read the speech
    • Thanks Fredrik Malm for his long work in the Riksdag. Expresses agreement regarding issues concerning the two-state solution, the Kurds' situation and the commitment to Ukraine. Read the speech
    • The questioner asks why the government is pushing forward with the reorganization despite the authorities' warnings about risks. Also asks if the minister can guarantee that efficiency will not be impaired due to the hasty timeline. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government is rushing the reorganization and argues that this risks worsening the intelligence activities. Argues that one should wait until after the election to avoid risking the current operations. Read the speech
  2. Export control of war materiel and dual-use products 2025

    Strategisk exportkontroll 2025 - krigsmateriel och produkter med dubbla användningsområden och Ett modernt och anpassat regelverk för krigsmateriel · 8 June 2026

    • Criticizes arms exports to Israel with reference to international court warnings regarding war crimes and genocide. Asks how exports to Israel can be compatible with Sweden's international obligations. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Sweden Democrats want to send weapons to Israel despite condemning war crimes. Asks what conditions the Sweden Democrats have to implement their policy if they gain control over the issues. Read the speech
    • Proposes approval of the reservation against the export of war materiel to Israel. Criticizes the Sweden Democrats' demands for arms exports to Israel and argues that it would lead to Sweden becoming a pariah due to Israel's war crimes and genocide [11, 12-16]. Read the speech
    • Answers the question about the visit to Iran by explaining that it aimed to free oppositionists. Argues that exports to Israel cannot take place as the country is accused of serious war crimes. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that arms exports to Israel could be used to commit war crimes against civilians. Argues that there is impunity for the Israeli army and that Sweden risks embarrassing itself internationally. Read the speech
    • Asks if the right can guarantee that no arms exports to Israel occur in the event of a currency exit. Argues that Sweden should not increase exports given the criminal court's assessments regarding war crimes and genocide. Read the speech
    • Questions whether the Moderaterna can guarantee that the Sverigedemokraterna will not get their way if they are given influence over the positions of Minister for Foreign Affairs, Minister for Defence, or Minister for Justice. Expresses concern that Sweden could begin to arm Israel and thereby contribute to war crimes. Read the speech
  3. Sweden's Nato role 2025: defense priorities and readiness tax

    Verksamheten i Nato 2025 · 1 June 2026

    • Argues that Sweden is an active and appreciated NATO member that contributes to defense in Latvia and Poland. Proposes a readiness tax on high incomes to finance defense and criticizes the government's economic policy and increasing deficit. Read the speech
    • Corrects information regarding the national debt and argues that it will increase significantly. Proposes a readiness tax for high-income earners to finance increased military expenditures without pressuring the public sector. Asks how the financing is to be carried out given the large deficits. Read the speech
    • Argues that poor public finances and increased national debt create security policy risks. Criticizes that the current government has exhausted the surplus and argues that defense expenditures must be financed fairly by those with the highest incomes contributing. Read the speech
  4. Sweden security policy: Nato membership, nuclear weapons, DCA

    Säkerhetspolitik · 16 April 2026

    • Argues that the deteriorated security situation requires a principled line regarding international law. Criticizes the government's broken promises and the Sweden Democrats' historical connections to authoritarian forces. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Sweden Democrats for being impressed by authoritarian leaders and questions what policy a government with them would pursue. Argues that the Sweden Democrats are naive when they open up for more nuclear weapons, which undermines the non-proliferation agreement. Read the speech
    • Asks how the speaker relates to their party's contacts with authoritarian leaders. Criticizes the party for wavering in security policy and for now wanting to undermine the non-proliferation agreement. Argues that their policy increases the risk of nuclear war. Read the speech
    • Argues that the DCA agreement is an asset because it enables rapid external assistance in the event of an attack. Criticizes the proposal to leave the agreement as it would send a signal to Russia and risk that Sweden would not receive necessary support. Read the speech
    • Argues that the American defense cooperation works well and is important for Sweden. Criticizes the claim that Sweden lacks control over nuclear weapons and warns that reduced cooperation with the USA would benefit Putin. Read the speech
  5. Aid support to Hepatica and Olof Palme International Centre

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:408 om biståndsstödet till Hepatica och Olof Palmes Internationella Center · 13 April 2026

    • Accuses the government of allowing corruption by forcing Sida to pay out aid money to Hepatica despite warnings of extreme risks. Argues that money has been funneled to an anti-abortion organization in Brazil and asks why the government does not intervene. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government allows cheating and a lack of transparency at Hepatica. Argues that the Minister avoids criticizing the Sweden Democrats' organization despite money being funneled to an anti-abortion organization. Also accuses the government of micromanaging Sida and threatening officials. Read the speech
    • Argues that Swedish tax money has been funneled to an organization controlled by the Bolsonaro family. Criticizes the Sweden Democrats for intimidating officials at Sida to secure funds and accuses the government of withdrawing support for women and democracy activists to direct money to Hepatica. Read the speech
  6. Sweden's foreign policy, China, Morocco, and 1% aid goal

    Internationella relationer · 26 March 2026

    • Criticizes the Sweden Democrats for being part of the MAGA movement and for their previous nominations of Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. Asks what the speaker thinks about Trump today. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Sweden Democrats' close contacts with the MAGA movement and Russian nationalists. Asks whether the party could really stand up to Donald Trump if they enter government. Read the speech
    • Argues that the rules-based world order must be defended and demands that everyone lives by it. Criticizes the government's cuts to UN organizations and proposes a new Africa strategy to deepen relations with the continent. Read the speech
    • Argues that the feminist foreign policy provided a framework for effectively promoting women's rights internationally. Claims that evaluations show tangible effects through targeted aid and highlights concrete results, such as released prisoners in Iran. Read the speech
    • Argues that the trip to Tehran was necessary to negotiate for political prisoners and that during the meetings, it was successful to raise issues regarding democracy and equality. Criticizes the opposing party for having worsened women's rights by withdrawing aid to Afghanistan. Read the speech
    • Asks why the government is cutting the appropriations to the UN despite it being crucial for security. Criticizes the draconian cuts to various UN bodies and asks why one is withdrawing from several countries in Africa. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's decision to reduce support to several UN organizations, which contradicts Sweden's tradition. Argues that the reduction risks sending the wrong signals to other countries and that the withdrawn support to UNRWA worsens the situation for the people of Gaza. Read the speech
  7. Sweden foreign policy: Ukraine aid, Nato, and DCA agreement

    Utrikespolitisk debatt · 18 February 2026

    • Criticizes the Israeli government's decision to de facto annex the West Bank and the settlers' violence against civilians. Asks whether it is reasonable for Sweden to continue exporting war materiel to Israel despite suspicions of war crimes. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Foreign Minister does not report concrete measures. Argues that Sweden must take actions such as pausing the association agreement with Israel, stopping settlement goods, and stopping the export of war materiel in order to uphold respect for international law. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's hesitant attitude towards the USA and argues that Sweden must meet Trump with clarity and strength. Argues that Sweden should reduce its strategic dependence on the USA, increase aid to the one percent goal, and return to a feminist foreign policy. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden should be a responsible citizen by solving climate problems and maintaining development aid. Asks what the Sweden Democrats' policy would look like in a government position if they seek support from Trump. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the arrogant tone regarding women's rights. Argues that feminist foreign policy is about highlighting women's rights and resources and wants to reinstate the policy as it had important effects on the aid side. Read the speech
    • Argues that there is agreement on defense policy and increased defense spending. Proposes a readiness tax to finance the defense without burdening future generations or welfare. Wants to raise the tax for high-income earners. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Minister for Foreign Affairs for being absent from meetings of the Ministers for Foreign Affairs. Argues that the government has ignored the financing of defense expenditures and suggests that people with high incomes should contribute more to turn the situation around. Read the speech
    • Wants to review the possibility of introducing national sanctions, such as stopping the settlers' goods. Argues that Sweden is missing the climate goals and delegating the responsibility to others. Emphasizes that climate change increases conflicts and advocates for a cautious de-risking strategy towards China. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden must point out violations of human rights in all contexts. Criticizes great powers' attempts to create spheres of influence and emphasizes the importance of guarding people's freedom and self-determination. Read the speech
    • Welcomes developments in a democratic direction and increased human rights in Iran. Argues that Sweden should increase the pressure on the Iranian regime to achieve a different development and abolish the oppression. Read the speech
    • Explains that the government visit to Iran aimed to free political prisoners, which also occurred. Argues that diplomatic contacts should be used to drive change and emphasizes that the line is to increase the pressure on Iran. Read the speech
    • Argues that the party has pushed for extended sanctions against Iran and the labeling of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization. Criticizes Fredrik Malm for dismantling support for women and girls by reducing aid. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Social Democratic government initiated the support for Ukraine. Criticizes the government's systematic dismantling of aid to women and girls in, among other places, Afghanistan and Africa. Wants to reintroduce a feminist foreign policy. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Sweden Democrats' connections to Russian narratives and their praises of Donald Trump. Asks how one should interpret the party's stance on the MAGA movement after Trump's threats against Denmark and Greenland. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Sweden Democrats request support from Trump despite describing his administration as unpredictable. Argues that Trump is prepared to support far-right parties in Europe and asks what line a Sweden Democrat foreign minister would pursue. Read the speech
  8. International cooperation, aid to Somalia and security policy

    (forts. från § 13) Internationell samverkan (forts. UU1) · 3 December 2025

    • Criticizes that millions of kronor from Swedish tax money have been funneled to the Somali Prime Minister's office via aid. Asks if the government is prepared to reconsider its position in order to investigate the corruption. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Foreign Affairs Committee has a responsibility to follow up on where tax money goes. Criticizes the government for misleading information about individuals in Somalia and argues that money has been funneled under the table via international organizations. Read the speech
  9. Sweden's international cooperation, aid policy and Ukraine

    Internationell samverkan · 3 December 2025

    • Criticizes that millions of Swedish tax kronor have gone to corrupt services and cousins of the Somali prime minister. Asks if the opposing party is prepared to reconsider the decision not to summon international organizations for an audit. Read the speech
    • Argues that members of Parliament have a responsibility to monitor the government. Criticizes that money from Swedish aid has been diverted to individuals close to the Somali prime minister and demands that this be investigated thoroughly. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's economic policy and planned budget deficit. Argues that the USA's actions in the Caribbean Sea are unacceptable and demands that both Russia and Israel be held accountable for war crimes. Read the speech
    • Rejects the claim that Fatah is a terrorist organization and emphasizes that Hamas is an Islamist terrorist organization that should not be part of a future Palestine. Argues that Sweden stands up for international law and the Palestinians' right to self-determination. Read the speech
    • Argues that Fatah is not a terrorist organization and that it is Israeli settlers who are armed in the West Bank. Criticizes the Sweden Democrats' cooperation with extreme right-wing nationalist politicians and suggests that they break these contacts. Read the speech
  10. Raoul Wallenberg Institute research funding and library grant

    Svar på interpellation 2025/26:45 om Raoul Wallenberg-institutets forskning om mänskliga rättigheter och humanitär rätt · 23 October 2025

    • Argues that the Raoul Wallenberg Institute is an important national resource with a unique international reputation. Criticizes the government's curt answers and lack of permanent state core funding. Asks if one must wait until 2028 to receive funds. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government has not promised more than to investigate the issue and argues that the institute is an important national resource. Asks if it is possible to receive the money earlier or if they cannot be received. Read the speech
  11. Crime in welfare, Gaza arms embargo and employer costs

    Statsministerns frågestund · 12 June 2025

    • Argues that Sweden is alone in withdrawing all support for UNRWA. Asks the Prime Minister where he received the information that other organizations can replace UNRWA. Read the speech
  12. Sweden's role in NATO 2024: SD, V, and S positions

    Verksamheten i Nordatlantiska fördragsorganisationen (Nato) under 2024 · 10 June 2025

    • Argues that Swedish NATO membership was the only sensible option and that Sweden should contribute constructively to make the organization stronger. Proposes a readiness tax on high incomes and a total defense fund to finance necessary investments. Read the speech
  13. Strategic export control of war materiel and dual-use products

    Strategisk exportkontroll 2024 - krigsmateriel och produkter med dubbla användningsområden · 10 June 2025

    • Argues that the current order for export control is good, but criticizes that products such as rifle scopes for hunting can be used for war crimes in Gaza. Wants the government to take measures to stop this export. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
  14. Raoul Wallenberg Institute state funding and 10 million SEK

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:624 om statlig grundfinansiering av Raoul Wallenberg-institutet · 3 June 2025

    • Argues that the Raoul Wallenberg Institute is a national resource with a high international reputation. Asks whether the government will prioritize a permanent state basic funding for the institute in the upcoming budget negotiations. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Raoul Wallenberg Institute is a national resource that should have permanent state funding. Wants the government to clarify its intention to prioritize the issue in the autumn budget negotiations because the current funds are temporary. Read the speech
  15. Sweden's foreign policy, aid budget and Taiwan cooperation

    Internationella relationer m.m. · 8 May 2025

    • Proposes approval of reservations on international cooperation and consular affairs. Criticizes the government's passivity and cuts in aid and UN support. Argues that Sweden should re-establish the feminist foreign policy and intensify efforts to free imprisoned citizens. Read the speech
    • Argues that aid is a matter of life and death and criticizes that Sweden is reducing aid in Africa and Southeast Asia. Wants to return to the one percent goal through a ladder to increase aid. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government plans to increase aid by one percent through a series of grants. Criticizes that the Moderaterna are reducing aid, which gives China and Russia geopolitical room for maneuver. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the Sweden Democrats are cutting funding to UN organizations despite advocating for a stronger Swedish representation in the UN. Asks how the speaker can advocate for a stronger position in the UN while funding for important UN organizations is being reduced. Read the speech
    • Asks for evidence for the claims about the UN's inefficiency and criticizes cuts in disaster relief. Argues that Sweden must invest in the UN to maintain its credibility and influence in international contexts. Read the speech
  16. New law on international sanctions: reporting and Russian vetoes

    Ny lag om internationella sanktioner · 7 May 2025

    • Argues that Sweden has not distinguished itself in maintaining sanctions against Russia. Asks how the government intends to prioritize and intensify the fight to prosecute companies and individuals who violate the sanctions. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden has a responsibility to gain full control over sanctions. Criticizes that Swedish authorities are not as effective as other countries' and urges the government to strengthen resources and mandates to combat crime. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that Sweden has not been effective enough in upholding sanctions and that no indictments have been filed despite known violations. Demands that the government strongly intensifies the fight against sanctions violations and prioritizes cases where Swedish companies earn money from trade with Russia. Read the speech
    • Means that he does not rule out seeking opportunities for national sanctions. Wants to investigate whether such instruments are compatible with EU law. Read the speech
    • Proposes moving to qualified majority for foreign policy decisions in order to be able to make decisions despite blockages from a small group of countries. Argues that this can be used to secure necessary sanctions in various conflicts. Read the speech
  17. Sweden's foreign policy: Ukraine aid, feminist policy and DCA

    Utrikespolitisk debatt · 12 February 2025

    • Read the speech
    • Argues that the government is wrong about UNRWA and that Sweden is betraying the Palestinians by withdrawing support. Criticizes that support for programs that protect Palestinian children in the West Bank is being withdrawn and asks why Sweden is betraying the Palestinians. Read the speech
    • Argues that the rules-based world order is threatened by Russia's aggression and the actions of the USA. Criticizes the government for being passive, reducing aid, and withdrawing from the global arena. Read the speech
    • Argues that the rules-based world order must apply to all countries without exception. Asks if the opposing party wants to abandon this world order, which could lead to a more dangerous situation. Read the speech
    • Argues that double standards cannot be applied and that the same rules must apply to all countries. Demands that Israel withdraw from occupied territory and that disproportionate warfare as well as violations of international law be addressed. Wants to stand up for the rules-based world order and its institutions. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden has close contact with Nordic party friends. Criticizes the Foreign Minister's reaction to the criticism of Trump's move regarding Greenland and argues that Sweden must stand up for the rules-based world order. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Foreign Minister's personal attacks and argues that the focus should be on the security policy challenges. Asks for clarity regarding Sweden's line to fully support international law and the rules-based world order. Read the speech
    • Means that the criticism is directed at Israel's disproportionate warfare and occupation, not against the state as such. Wants to see a two-state solution where the occupation and the settlements cease to enable peace. Read the speech
    • Argues that the UN loses its legitimacy if it does not dare to address the Palestinian issue. Wants to cooperate to reach a two-state solution where a Palestinian and an Israeli state live side by side through compromises from both sides. Read the speech
    • Argues that the party drives its positions in dialogue with foreign sister parties. Denies that the German social democrats are the threat to support for Ukraine, but argues that the threat comes from the far-right opposition. Read the speech
    • Asks what the speaker did when his former colleagues were in government. Argues that Sweden must maintain broad diplomatic relations, including with China. Read the speech
    • Asks if he is prepared to make an effort to resume the Ecumenical Companion Program. Criticizes that Sweden is withdrawing support for the program that protects Palestinian children and livestock herders against settler violence. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government can change the aid policy at any time. Criticizes that the support is withdrawn when the violence increases in Västbanken and emphasizes the importance of protecting children. Read the speech
  18. Sweden's withdrawal of core support to UNRWA

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:299 om förbudet av UNRWA · 24 January 2025

    • Criticizes the decision to withdraw core funding to UNRWA as catastrophic and argues that it violates the UN line, the EU line, as well as the government's own policy. Argues that the decision weakens UNRWA's work in several countries and asks if the government has had contact with the countries concerned. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government is violating the UN line, the EU line, and its own policy by withdrawing the financial support to UNRWA. Demands that the government reconsider the decision in order to once again be able to contribute to maintaining the important organization. Read the speech
  19. Sweden's cooperation with ICC and execution of arrest warrants

    Svar på interpellationerna 2024/25:298 och 303 om Sveriges samarbete med ICC · 24 January 2025

    • Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Foreign Minister for creating confusion regarding Sweden's obligations. Argues that Sweden as a state is obligated to arrest persons suspected of war crimes and urges the government to clearly defend the rules-based world order. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden as a state must take its obligations seriously by arresting persons with arrest warrants. Wants to protect the ICC by working to ensure that the court can collect evidence in Gaza. Read the speech
  20. Sweden's foreign policy: Nordic focus, ICC support, China

    Internationell samverkan · 4 December 2024

    • Proposes approval of the reservation regarding the appropriation structure to protect Sipri and the Institute of International and Strategic Studies. Criticizes the government's reluctance to send Jas Gripen to Ukraine and requests a clearer foreign policy where Sweden actively uses its voice in the UN. Argues that international law must apply equally to everyone, including Israel, and demands strong support for the ICC and ICJ. Suggests that the EU pauses trade agreements with Israel and introduces sanctions against settlers. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden must uphold international institutions and respect their decisions. Asks whether Sweden has an obligation to arrest and extradite suspects of crimes, such as Benjamin Netanyahu, if the opportunity is given. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden has an obligation to arrest and extradite persons whom the International Criminal Court wants to bring to justice. Emphasizes that international law must be applied consistently in all situations to maintain a rules-based legal order. Read the speech
  21. Sweden national security strategy: business, weapons, climate

    (forts. från § 11) Nationell säkerhetsstrategi (forts. UU6) · 27 November 2024

    • Moves to approve the reservation. Criticizes the government for the strategy lacking broad consensus and concrete measures to secure healthcare, medicines, infrastructure, and electricity supply. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the strategy lacks broad consensus and that the government did not invite to negotiations. Argues that security also includes healthcare, railways, and electricity production, and asks if the Minister for Defence is concerned that public services function poorly in peacetime. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the claim that the strategy has been negotiated or that one has been invited to talks. Argues that the strategy had not been seen before it landed in the Riksdag and wants negotiations to include proposals on healthcare and infrastructure. Read the speech
  22. Middle East situation: ceasefire, Iran, and Israel's defense

    Särskild debatt om situationen i Mellanöstern · 25 October 2024

    • Describes the situation in Gaza as a bloodbath and argues that Israel's excessive use of force is not justified by Hamas's terrorist attacks. Criticizes the government's passivity and suggests that Sweden should designate Iran's Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization and freeze the trade agreement with Israel. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government for lacking action in the international community to de-escalate the situation. Asks if the Foreign Minister is prepared to take initiative in the EU to ban the settlers' goods from the internal market. Read the speech
    • Argues that the dialogue with Israel is not working and that one must move from words to action. Proposes that the trade agreement be paused until Israel complies with international law. Asks if the Foreign Minister is prepared to block the settlers' goods from the EU market. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's lack of concrete actions and demands clarity on whether they will stop goods from settlers. Argues that one must move from words to action to stop the suffering. Read the speech
    • Argues that it does not serve the Palestinians to seek refuge in Russia. Asks how the opposing party intends to support the Palestinian state, which is the only actor standing for a two-state solution. Suggests that support for the Palestinian state is needed to be constructive. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Palestinian state is hindered by Israel's withholding of tax revenues and illegal settlements. Denies that previous contacts with Palestinian representatives have lacked effect and advocates for a return to compromise-willing forces for a two-state solution. Read the speech
    • Proposes increasing pressure on Iran by pushing the issue of blacklisting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard. Argues that Sweden should freeze the trade agreement with Israel until international law is complied with and stop trade with settlement goods. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's passivity when Sweden abstained from a UN resolution supporting the International Court of Justice's decision. Argues that Sweden should instead be active and come forward with new proposals to play a constructive role. Read the speech
    • Argues that both parties are bound by international law and that Israel should withdraw from the occupied territories. Asks whether the Christian Democrats still have contacts with the settler movement and what their position is on sanctions against settlers. Read the speech
    • Argues that Ola Möller has clarified the issue by withdrawing his statement. Emphasizes that both Russia and Israel are bound by the same international law and must withdraw from their respective occupied territories. Read the speech
    • Clarifies that the recognition of Palestine did not give legitimacy to Hamas but to the Palestinian Authority. Argues that many countries now recognize Palestine in order to strengthen the good forces in the region. Read the speech
    • Argues that elections are missing in the Palestinian state because Israel does not allow them. Asks if Fredrik Malm is prepared to work for elections there if all Palestinians in the occupied territories, including East Jerusalem, are given the opportunity to vote. Read the speech
    • Asks whether the Christian Democrats have broken with the militant settler movement at Västbanken. Also asks whether Magnus Berntsson thinks that the grants to the Swedish Committee against Antisemitism should be withdrawn. Read the speech
    • Hopes for support for the proposal that settlement goods should be banned on the European market. Asks if the speaker can guarantee continued support for the Swedish Committee Against Antisemitism to avoid their funding being withdrawn. Read the speech
    • Argues that antisemitism is a poison that exists in many different circles. Asks if the Liberals will stand guard over the support for the Swedish Committee against Antisemitism and stop the Sweden Democrats' attacks against the committee. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that a party attacks an organization and argues that it is important not to let oneself be swayed by the Sverigedemokraterna on the issue of support for the Svenska kommittén mot antisemitism. Read the speech
  23. Israel's actions in Lebanon and compliance with international law

    Svar på interpellation 2024/25:47 om Israel och den internationella rätten i Libanon · 18 October 2024

    • Criticizes the government's passivity and lack of concrete measures to uphold international law. Proposes that Sweden should freeze trade agreements with Israel, expand sanctions against settlers and list Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard on the terror list. Read the speech
    • Argues that a two-state solution is the only path to peace. Proposes that Iran be blacklisted, that the EU freezes its trade agreement with Israel and that Sweden should take a clearer stand for international law. Read the speech
  24. Defense cooperation with USA: DCA agreement and nuclear risk

    (forts.) Avtal om försvarssamarbete med Amerikas förenta stater (forts. UFöU1) · 18 June 2024

    • Argues that the agreement is crucial for Sweden's security and enables rapid American support as well as joint exercises. Clarifies that the agreement does not concern nuclear weapons and emphasizes that it is based on consent and respect for Sweden's sovereignty. Read the speech
    • Argues that the connection between the ASAP Rocky incident and the DCA agreement is far-fetched. Denies that American soldiers would go unpunished and explains that American jurisdiction applies in collisions, but that Sweden can reclaim jurisdiction in specific cases. Read the speech
    • Argues that there are already regulations ensuring that Americans do not go unpunished. Criticizes that Vänsterpartiet and Miljöpartiet want to reject the agreement based on issues regarding jurisdiction, as the agreement is crucial for Sweden's security. Read the speech
  25. Sweden's foreign policy: China, Taiwan, India and feminist policy

    Internationella relationer m.m. · 13 June 2024

    • Criticizes the government for having abolished the feminist foreign policy and for cutting support to the UN. Argues that Sweden should invest in an Africa strategy to create development and counter migration flows. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government for cutting the appropriations to UN bodies such as UN Women, World Food Programme and the green climate fund. Asks why the government is cutting these appropriations if they at the same time want to safeguard the UN's central role. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden is an active member that influences the UN and criticizes proposals for reduced support as they send the wrong signals. Argues that cuts weaken the UN's ability to handle security threats and humanitarian needs. Read the speech
    • Refutes accusations of unworthy conduct and argues that the reaction to Björn Söder's homophobic statements was justified. Claims that Söder is unsuitable for his role in the OSCE delegation due to his behavior. Read the speech
  26. Sweden export control: Jas Gripen to Ukraine and Israel

    Strategisk exportkontroll 2023 - krigsmateriel och produkter med dubbla användningsområden · 10 June 2024

    • Argues that Sweden has a world-class production of defense materiel which is a great asset for both the own defense and for helping Ukraine. Wants Sweden to send Jas Gripen to Ukraine and criticizes the government's decision to postpone this. Emphasizes that Sweden has one of the world's strictest legislations for arms exports with a unique democracy criterion. Read the speech
    • Asks which countries are referred to when it is said that feminist foreign policy has placed obstacles to arms exports. Argues that arms exports to Israel would be a violation of Swedish principles because the country is waging a war with terrible consequences for civilians. Read the speech
    • Asks if the speaker means that ISP should not check whether women's and children's rights are violated in exporting countries. Means that it is important with strict legislation that takes such rights into account. Clarifies that Sweden does not export weapons to countries that occupy land or conduct warfare where tens of thousands of people have died. Read the speech
    • Advises against moving the authority over arms exports to the EU level as Sweden must retain control. Asks why Sweden cannot send Jas planes to Ukraine when it is possible to send French planes. Read the speech
    • Argues that considerations in arms exports are made based on Ukraine's needs and Swedish security. Criticizes the Defense Minister's arguments against sending Jas planes and argues that these planes are suitable for Ukraine's warfare. Read the speech
  27. Sweden security policy: Nato membership and nuclear deterrence

    Vissa säkerhetspolitiska frågor · 30 May 2024

    • Accuses the Sweden Democrats of running a troll factory that spreads Russian propaganda, incitement, and hate through fake accounts. Asks if the party intends to abolish the troll factory and close its fake accounts. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Sweden Democrats for running a troll factory with fake and secret accounts to spread disinformation. Argues that the party is the only one proceeding with this and demands that they immediately shut down their accounts. Read the speech
    • Proposes approval of the reservation on nuclear disarmament. Argues that Sweden must continue to work for mutual disarmament through agreements between nuclear powers. Criticizes the government for not sending observers to the convention's conferences of the states parties. Emphasizes that Sweden must not have nuclear weapons on Swedish soil. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Moderaterna for an unclear position and argues that Sweden must not receive nuclear weapons on Swedish soil as it would violate the non-proliferation treaty. Wants the Moderaterna to honor the common agreement and asks if they stand by the ban on nuclear weapons on Swedish territory. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Moderaternas position that Sweden should bear the same burdens as other Nato countries regarding nuclear weapons. Argues that Sweden should maintain the same line as Norway, Denmark and Finland and that nuclear disarmament can occur through agreements between nuclear-armed powers. Read the speech
    • Argues that the conditions for achieving successful negotiations with Iran are very difficult due to the country's current leadership. Responds to the question that the negotiations are not expected to bear fruit in the near future. Read the speech
    • Argues that one must continue to try to find processes to increase common security in the world. Warns that a total deviation from such processes risks leading to countries acquiring nuclear weapons. Reminds that it has historically been possible to negotiate with dictatorships to reduce the number of nuclear warheads. Read the speech
    • Asks if Aron Emilsson stands by the agreement that Sweden shall not have nuclear weapons or permanent bases on Swedish soil in peacetime. Argues that it is that model that applies and that NATO membership or the DCA agreement shall not affect this. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden must strive for mutual nuclear disarmament through agreements between nuclear powers because nuclear weapons constitute an existential threat to humanity. Emphasizes that neither NATO membership nor the DCA agreement may mean that nuclear weapons are placed on Swedish soil. Read the speech
    • Accuses the Sweden Democrats of running a troll factory that spreads Russian propaganda, incitement, and hate. Criticizes the Liberals for having reconciled with the Sweden Democrats despite their actions. Asks when the Liberals intend to take action against the Sweden Democrats. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Liberals for backing down in issues regarding joint press conferences and warns that the Sweden Democrats continue with mud-slinging and Russian propaganda via fake accounts despite the Liberals' demands. Read the speech
  28. Sweden's continued support for Ukraine and defense industry

    Särskild debatt om fortsatt stöd till Ukraina · 24 May 2024

    • Hope that the Sweden Democrats confirm their support for Ukraine without any upper time limit. Also requests a statement from the Minister of Defence regarding contributions of combat aircraft to Ukraine. Read the speech
    • Argues that Ukraine's struggle is a struggle for the fate of Europe and requires a united, long-term resistance against Russian despots. Criticizes the Sweden Democrats' rhetoric regarding limited support and demands a decision from the government regarding contributions of combat aircraft. Read the speech
    • Welcomes the new support package. Asks for an announcement regarding combat aircraft as Ukraine has requested this for a long time and an investigation is ongoing. Read the speech
    • Argues that Ukraine has long requested combat aircraft and that an investigation is already on the Defense Minister's desk. Wants to receive a notification on when Sweden will decide on contributions of Jas aircraft. Read the speech
    • Requests a statement on whether Sweden will contribute with fighter jets. Criticizes the Sweden Democrats' statements regarding an upper limit for the support and asks why they reason that Sweden would soon run out of materiel. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government made a historic decision by contributing weapons to Ukraine already four days after the invasion. Asks for a statement on why it has been expressed that there is an upper limit for the material support. Read the speech
    • Argues that all parties in the Riksdag agree on supporting Ukraine as long as it is needed. Points out that the Sweden Democrats' signals can be linked to a broader European discussion among right-wing parties. Read the speech
    • Argues that one should not create special rules for a specific refugee group since all asylum seekers live under the same conditions. Hopes that the work to create a population registry for the group is carried out expeditiously. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Questions about the Liberals' opinion on the Sweden Democrats' statements regarding an upper limit for the support to Ukraine. Also asks whether the Liberals have any decision or opinion regarding fighter jets to Ukraine. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the message about limited stocks and an upper limit for the support is a gift to Putin. Asks about the Liberals' position regarding air forces to Ukraine. Read the speech
  29. Sweden's support for Gaza and UNRWA aid debate

    Särskild debatt om Sveriges stöd till Gaza · 19 April 2024

    • Criticizes the government's previous freezing of the support to UNRWA and argues that it is wrong to prioritize reducing aid to Palestine in the current catastrophe situation. Asks if the government intends to reconsider the decision. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government is prioritizing the reduction of long-term development aid to Palestine. Argues that the government did not answer why the total amount is being reduced and the support integrated into another strategy. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government prioritizes reducing aid to Palestine by lowering the total amount and withdrawing support for UNRWA and civil society. Argues that the government's focus on entrepreneurship is a smokescreen that hides the fact that they are turning their backs on the Palestinians. Read the speech
    • Argues that one cannot punish the entire UNRWA for the actions of individual individuals since the organization is crucial for reaching the starving population. Criticizes the government for lowering the ambitions and the prioritization of long-term aid to Palestine. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the unfounded accusations against UNRWA. Argues that it is unreasonable to paralyze an entire organization and punish innocent people by letting children starve to death. Asks if the speaker is prepared to let children starve to death. Read the speech
    • Argues that Hamas is a separate actor from Fatah, which Sweden has cooperated with. Claims that UNRWA is the only organization with the capacity to deliver supplies and criticizes that the opponent wants to paralyze the organization. Read the speech
  30. Sweden's Nato membership security and 3% GDP military buildup

    Utrikespolitisk debatt med anledning av Sveriges medlemskap i Nato · 20 March 2024

    • Welcomes the NATO membership which makes Sweden safer and strengthens the alliance. Argues that Sweden should not accept the deployment of nuclear weapons or permanent bases and emphasizes that Sweden shall retain its voice in foreign policy. Read the speech
    • Argues that defense expenditures have almost doubled since 2014 and that Sweden now reaches 2 percent of GDP. Asks if the opposing party is prepared to discuss how the increased expenditures shall be financed without it affecting welfare. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Argues that a negative development in the USA would be very negative for Europe. Explains that the DCA agreement aims for rapid assistance in the event of an attack through the storage of American materiel and is an important step for security. Read the speech
    • Rejects the image of Sweden having hesitated with the support to Ukraine and argues that Sweden has been quick to contribute with military materiel. Suggests that Sweden, together with other countries, continues to support Ukraine and wants to send Jas planes. Read the speech
    • Rejects that fear of escalation has been a factor in the discussions. Argues that Sweden has contributed a lot with weapons systems that Ukraine needed and suggests that Russian frozen assets be used to purchase ammunition. Read the speech
    • Argues that the change in security policy line is due to the need to protect the security of the Swedish people. Points out that Russia's attack on Ukraine destroyed the European security order and asks if the Liberalerna regret their previous disarmament. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden chose neutrality after World War II to promote both Sweden's and Finland's interests. Criticizes that the speaker nonchalantly treats Finland's situation and argues that Sweden's NATO membership would have put Finland in a more difficult position. Read the speech
  31. Foreign policy: Ukraine, Gaza, aid reform and China-Taiwan

    Utrikespolitisk debatt · 14 February 2024

    • Argues that the government's policy is too provincial and criticizes the reduction of aid to civil society and UN Women. Asks whether the government will reconsider the decision to withdraw support to UNRWA to help civilians in Gaza. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Foreign Minister for being unclear regarding the UNRWA support. Argues that the aid cannot wait for an investigation and demands that the support be resumed to save lives. Read the speech
    • Argues that the world is in a political state of emergency where democracy and international law are threatened by right-wing forces and Russian influence. Demands an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, that Sweden reconsider the decision to withdraw support for UNRWA and that Ukraine receives unwavering support until the war is won. Read the speech
    • Argues that a terrible war is ongoing in Gaza and criticizes the opponent for spreading disinformation. Argues that individual individuals should be investigated but that support for UNRWA should not be withdrawn, as it affects innocent people. Read the speech
    • Argues that the UN's message is to investigate allegations against UNRWA rather than to dismantle the organization. Rejects allegations of antisemitism and urges the speaker to examine their own views. Read the speech
    • Advocates for continued long-term military support to Ukraine. Argues that money should not be borrowed specifically for this purpose and that deliveries must be balanced against Sweden's own security. Read the speech
    • Argues that it is difficult to balance how much defense materiel can be donated without undermining Sweden's own defense. Emphasizes that Sweden shall contribute to Ukraine but not in a way that weakens its own security. Read the speech
    • Asks how the speaker views settlements on the West Bank and if he supports sanctions against militant settlers. Also asks if he can guarantee that the foundation does not finance settlements, which some Israeli voices accuse it of. Read the speech
    • Argues that it is required that settlers on the West Bank either accept to join a new Palestinian state or that their settlements are evacuated. Welcomes the Christian Democrats' stance against settler violence and expansion. Read the speech
    • Argues that it is difficult to place demands on individual aid workers in environments controlled by terrorist organizations as it can involve life-threatening danger. Suggests that instead, specific allegations against individuals should be investigated and criticizes the government for risking the aid to hundreds of thousands of people by withdrawing support to the entire organization. Read the speech
    • Rejects the allegations of links to Hamas and argues that the Social Democrats rather constitute a counterweight to Hamas through their sister party Fatah. Explains that Jamal El-Haj violated the party's rules and that he therefore was not allowed to participate in the conference. Read the speech
    • Asks how the party views aggressive militant settlers. Points out that the Israeli minister who met the speaker has close ties to the settler movement and has advocated for measures that violate international law. Read the speech
    • Asks why one associates with politicians who stand close to extreme groups if one distances oneself from settlers and colonialism. Means that the parties handle questions about what is acceptable in different ways. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government base only takes in information from the Israeli side. Asks if Joar Forssell is interested in information from only one side. Read the speech
    • Agrees that Hamas's military capacity must be dismantled. Argues that the government base should obtain information from the Palestinian Authority and the embassy. Read the speech
  32. Situation in Gaza and West Bank: ceasefire and self-defense

    Svar på interpellationerna 2023/24:326, 340 och 341 om situationen i Gaza och på Västbanken · 23 January 2024

    • Criticizes the warfare in Gaza as a massive act of violence and a massacre where most of the victims are women and children. Urges the government to actively push for an immediate ceasefire in the UN and the EU. Read the speech
    • Urges the Minister for Foreign Affairs to use all political and economic means to push for an immediate ceasefire. Wants Sweden to take the lead in the EU to actively push for this. Read the speech
  33. Sweden's international cooperation and foreign policy priorities

    Internationell samverkan · 6 December 2023

    • Criticizes the Sweden Democrats' divisive rhetoric and incitement against Muslims. Argues that this rhetoric increases the threat against minorities and is threat-driving towards Sweden. Asks if the party will continue with this hate speech. Read the speech
    • Asks if the speaker denies statements about burning Qurans or that Islam is a despicable religion. Means that the criticism is directed at the religion as such rather than violent Islamism and that the party exhibits hate speech towards minorities. Read the speech
    • Argues that international cohesion and international law are crucial for Sweden's profile. Criticizes the government for dismantling the feminist foreign policy and aid. Criticizes the Sweden Democrats for inciting hatred against Muslims and damaging Sweden's reputation. Asks the government parties to break the cooperation with SD. Read the speech
    • Argues that social democratic reforms have built up the Swedish welfare state. Criticizes the Moderaterna for boasting about the welfare state despite having opposed reforms. Argues that the Sverigedemokraterna's rhetoric against Islam increases hate crimes and hinders the Nato process. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the independent school system and its consequences for the school. Argues that the Social Democrats consistently condemn antisemitism and demands that the government break the cooperation with the Sverigedemokraterna due to their hate speech against minorities. Read the speech
    • Denies links between the party and radical Islam. Criticizes leading politicians for conducting hate campaigns against minorities and argues that such statements have concrete negative effects for Muslims in Sweden. Read the speech
    • Argues that all worldviews must be respected. Criticizes the Sweden Democrats' systematic agitation against Islam as harmful and divisive. Urges other parties to distance themselves from this and denies connections to the currents mentioned. Read the speech
  34. Disinformation, economy, crime and integration debate

    Statsministerns frågestund · 16 November 2023

    • Criticizes the Prime Minister for breaking an election promise by giving the Sverigedemokraterna influence in foreign policy. Asks if the Prime Minister intends to take initiative to have replaced a person who has made offensive statements about Jews. Read the speech
  35. Sweden's view on Israel-Gaza conflict and government actions

    Svar på interpellationerna 2023/24:139 och 147 om Sveriges syn på Israel-Gaza-konflikten · 16 November 2023

    • Argues that Israel has the right to defend itself against Hamas, but that civilian targets must not be attacked and that war crimes have been committed. Criticizes that Sweden did not support a proposal for a ceasefire in the UN and demands that Israel takes control over militant settlers. Asks if the Foreign Minister is prepared to condemn settler violence in international forums. Read the speech
    • Advocates for a humanitarian ceasefire and that the International Criminal Court (ICC) be allowed to investigate any war crimes. Criticizes the government's passivity and calls for strengthening the Palestinian Authority to enable a two-state solution. Read the speech
  36. Israel and Palestine: ICC contributions and two-state solution

    Särskild debatt om situationen i Israel och Palestina · 27 October 2023

    • Condemns Hamas's horrific acts of terrorism and argues that Israel has a right to self-defense within the framework of international law. Wants Sweden to significantly increase humanitarian aid to the Palestinian territories and work for a humanitarian pause. Read the speech
    • Asks if Sweden plans to increase its humanitarian aid to the region. Argues that it is more necessary than ever before in this situation. Read the speech
    • Confirms that Hamas has taken hostages in a horrific act of terrorism. Urges the government to scale up humanitarian aid to Palestinian civilians as the needs grow. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that Sweden has not increased the humanitarian aid to Gaza and suggests that Sweden should do the same. Argues that Hamas is the biggest obstacle to peace and wants the Palestinian Authority to be strengthened. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Social Democratic Party has good relations with both Israel and Palestine. Advocates for a two-state solution and wants to continue playing the role of bridge-builder between the parties. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Social Democrats have always acted for increased understanding and solutions. Criticizes the Sweden Democrats for preventing the government from increasing humanitarian aid to Gaza. Read the speech
    • Argues that Hamas must be fought uncompromisingly. Emphasizes that the Palestinian Authority is an important counterweight to Hamas and that it should be strengthened to enable a two-state solution. Read the speech
    • Argues that Abbas has been clear in his condemnation of civilian killings. Suggests that the Palestinian Authority should be strengthened and urges Israel to halt settlement expansion to enable a two-state solution. Read the speech
    • Rejects opening up for arms sales to Israel and argues that current legislation on arms exports should be maintained. Warns that such an opening could lead to demands for arms sales to the Palestinian Authority as well. Read the speech
    • Argues that the democracy criterion should be interpreted as an additional restriction on arms exports. Wants to maintain a restrictive view on arms exports according to current legislation and avoid opening up for exports to more countries. Read the speech
  37. EU activities 2022: sanctions, Cuba agreement and Belarus

    Verksamheten i Europeiska unionen under 2022 · 19 June 2023

    • Accuses the Sweden Democrats of historical falsification and disinformation. Argues that social democracy broke ground for democracy in Sweden and criticizes the Sweden Democrats for their historical roots in Nazism and the white power movement. Read the speech
    • Accuses the Sweden Democrats of historical falsification and disinformation. Criticizes the party for undermining academic freedom and the administrative tradition as well as for supporting authoritarian governments in Poland and Hungary. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government parties in the report have abandoned the traditional EU line and omitted criticism of Israel's occupation and settlements. Argues that both parties must work towards a two-state solution where international law is observed. Read the speech
  38. Security, welfare and immigration policy in PM's question time

    Statsministerns frågestund · 15 June 2023

    • Argues that Sweden is further away from Nato than before and that a failure in Vilnius would be a historical failure. Asks the Prime Minister about the outcome of the meeting and the plans if Sweden is kept out of Nato. Read the speech
  39. Sweden export controls for military and dual-use products

    Strategisk exportkontroll 2022 - krigsmateriel och produkter med dubbla användningsområden · 8 June 2023

    • Argues that Sweden's export of defense materiel is crucial for maintaining a domestic defense industry. Emphasizes that the regulatory framework is one of the world's strictest and that Sweden must continue to support Ukraine until its victory. Read the speech
    • Argues that the current regulatory framework is one of the world's strictest, most open and transparent. Underlines that exports to partner countries are important and that follow-on deliveries to the Middle East did not include war materiel for combat. Read the speech
    • Argues that the exports to the Middle East only included follow-on deliveries of other war materiel, not war materiel for combat. Explains that the presumption of consent for follow-on deliveries is necessary to maintain a Swedish defense industry and national security. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Argues that current legislation is functioning well and prevents exports to dictatorships. Asks which dictatorships and countries that violate human rights the Sweden Democrats want to export more weapons to. Read the speech
  40. Sweden's Nato membership: collective defense and security

    Sveriges medlemskap i Nato · 22 March 2023

    • Argues that Sweden's NATO membership is a historical decision to ensure maximum security in a more dangerous world. Explains that the decision is based on the fact that Sweden would otherwise stand alone in the Nordic region and emphasizes that rule of law principles must never be sacrificed in the negotiations. Read the speech
    • Argues that the Social Democrats have been clear from the beginning that Sweden shall not have nuclear weapons or permanent NATO bases. Claims that the solution works for Norway and Denmark and that Sweden can follow their example. Read the speech
    • Means that no one can force Sweden into the deployment of nuclear weapons or bases. Claims that Sweden maintains its independence and that future governments must return to the Riksdag to change the current stance. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government initiated the major upgrade of the defense and doubled the expenditures since 2014. Points out that they reintroduced conscription and emphasizes that the current security policy consensus was reached through a broad cross-bloc majority. Read the speech
    • Confirms that the reintroduction of conscription was correct. Argues that Russia's actions against Ukraine and Finland's choice were the decisive arguments for reconsidering the Social Democrats' position on Nato membership. Read the speech
  41. Sweden foreign policy, Ukraine aid and Russia sanctions debate

    Utrikespolitisk debatt · 15 February 2023

    • Criticizes the government's failure to keep Sweden and Finland together in the NATO process. Argues that it is a very serious issue that the plans could fall apart and asks the Foreign Minister how he will move the process forward. Read the speech
    • Argues that it is a serious issue if Finland joins Nato before Sweden. Urges the Foreign Minister to take the issue seriously and work to ensure that the process is driven forward. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's aid cuts and the abolition of feminist foreign policy. Argues that Sweden must re-establish the one percent goal for aid and demands clearer leadership in the NATO process to secure Sweden's security. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the Sweden Democrats' reckless statements and actions which have caused the Swedish Natoprocess to stall. Urges Aron Emilsson to take responsibility and distance himself from his party comrades' statements. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the lack of a clear distancing from reckless statements. Argues that such actions incite political violence and that the lack of distancing risks reflecting Sweden's position internationally. Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Read the speech
    • Argues that the Social Democrats are increasing aid and that the deductions are made according to international rules. Wants to return to the one percent target gradually in order to take responsibility for the state budget. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that Vänsterpartiet places the blame on Socialdemokraterna for the bourgeois actions. Argues that Socialdemokraterna take responsibility for the state finances by successively returning to the one percent goal as the economy allows. Read the speech
    • Stands for the terrorist classification of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard. Argues that Sweden's Nato membership was a necessary reaction to Russia's war against Ukraine and Finland's choice of path. Wants to re-establish the one percent goal for aid step by step. Read the speech
    • Explains that the large-scale war of aggression against Ukraine and Finland's process were decisive factors for Sweden's Nato membership. Expresses hope to be able to drive the process to completion and emphasizes that the party is a constructive partner in cooperation. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that an individual official was singled out in the debate. Argues that the NATO membership was an open decision based on the security situation and not the result of conspiracies or hidden power players. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the claim that external actors have been decisive for the Nato membership. Argues that the decision was based on Russia's attack on Ukraine and that the process has been open to the people. Read the speech
  42. Foreign policy, healthcare, Natoprocess crisis and EU sanctions

    Frågestund · 2 February 2023

    • Asks the Minister for Foreign Affairs what plan the government has to move the NATO process forward after it appears to be in a deep crisis. Furthermore criticizes a statement from the chairman of the Committee on Justice that has escalated the conflict. Read the speech
    • Argues that the government bears the responsibility for the fact that the Sweden Democrats' actions hinder the NATO process. Asks how the government will handle the situation to prevent this from happening again. Read the speech
  43. Sweden's international cooperation, security and foreign policy

    Internationell samverkan · 14 December 2022

    • Argues that Russia's attack on Ukraine is a violation of international law and demands continued economic, humanitarian, and military support. Criticizes the government's shift to the right, which damages Sweden's reputation, and demands a clear statement regarding reservations against nuclear weapons on Swedish soil. Read the speech
    • Argues that Russia's attack on Ukraine constitutes the greatest change to the European security order since the war. Requests a clear statement that the government parties still commit to expressing a reservation against nuclear weapons on Swedish soil. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden must be able to uphold international law in all contexts. Denies that the party has demanded that the Kurds should pay the price and emphasizes that the government must prioritize Sweden's security after the European security order collapsed. Read the speech
    • Argues that Sweden has a good international reputation and standing. Urges a clear statement on closing the door to nuclear weapons on Swedish soil. Read the speech
    • Questions about whether the government is closing the door to nuclear weapons and permanent NATO bases in Sweden. Argues that it is dangerous and destabilizing to open up the issue of nuclear weapons. Read the speech
    • Argues that there are clear links between hateful campaigns against Sweden and the Sweden Democrats. Claims that politicians should make decisions regarding nuclear weapons on Swedish soil through joint statements. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the new government prioritizes down other parts of the world. Argues that it is wrong to withdraw from engagement in, for example, Africa and Latin America. Read the speech
    • Criticizes the government's shaky stance regarding nuclear weapons on Swedish soil after the election. Asks if the government parties still stand by their previous promise not to have nuclear weapons on Swedish soil. Read the speech
    • Criticizes that the government is unclear and is changing its previous line regarding nuclear weapons on Swedish soil. Asks if the previous promises still hold and emphasizes that lack of clarity in foreign policy increases the risks for the country. Read the speech

Source: The Swedish Parliament. Kammarkoll is an independent service.